ArticleBone marrow transplantation2024
Feasibility and safety of the discontinuation of systemic immunosuppressive treatment after single-unit cord blood transplantation in adults.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Has early mortality following single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation improved in recent years? A nationwide registry data analysis from 2003 to 2022 in Japan.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We retrospectively evaluated the incidence, factors, and clinical outcomes of the discontinuation of immunosuppressive treatment (IST) after single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) in adults receiving cyclosporine-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis at our institute. Among the 309 patients who achieved engraftment, 247 were able to discontinue IST with a median follow-up of 121 months for survivors. The cumulative incidence of the discontinuation of IST was 46.2% at 180 days, 72.8% at 2 years, and 79.3% at 5 years post-CBT. In the multivariate analysis, discontinuation of IST after CBT was significantly associated with the requirement for steroid therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46; P < 0.001) and the recent calendar year of CBT (HR: 1.79; P < 0.001). In the conditional landmark analysis at 180 days, discontinuation of IST was not associated with the development of extensive chronic GVHD (HR: 1.00; P = 0.989), non-relapse mortality (HR: 0.49; P = 0.122), relapse (HR: 1.46; P = 0.388), or overall survival (HR: 1.91; P = 0.065). Our data showed that successful discontinuation of IST is common after single-unit CBT in adults. Discontinuation of IST did not affect subsequent outcomes, suggesting that discontinuation of IST is both feasible and safe in adults undergoing single-unit CBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.