Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38740902›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Intermittent theta-burst stimulation to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may increase potentiated startle in healthy individuals.

Marta Teferi, Hannah Gura, Milan Patel, Abigail Casalvera, Kevin G Lynch, Walid Makhoul, Zhi-De Deng, Desmond J Oathes, Yvette I Sheline, Nicholas L Balderston

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Using causal network mapping to clarify pre-clinical brain stimulation results.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marta TeferiCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hannah GuraCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Milan PatelCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abigail CasalveraCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kevin G LynchDepartment of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Walid MakhoulCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0035-5795
Zhi-De DengNoninvasive Neuromodulation Unit Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-0871
Desmond J OathesCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-2669
Yvette I ShelineCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-9659
Nicholas L BalderstonCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress Department of Psychiatry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. nicholas.balderston@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-1544

Funding

Examining the mechanisms of anxiety regulation using a novel, sham-controlled, fMRI-guided rTMS protocol and a translational laboratory model of anxiety.K01MH121777 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALDERSTON, NICHOLAS LEE · 2019 to 2022
$723k
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Brain & Behavior Research Foundation) Narsad 2018Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Brain & Behavior Research Foundation) Narsad 2021NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121777U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) K01MH121777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment protocols targeting the right dlPFC have been effective in reducing anxiety symptoms comorbid with depression. However, the mechanism behind these effects is unclear. Further, it is unclear whether these results generalize to non-depressed individuals. We conducted a series of studies aimed at understanding the link between anxiety potentiated startle and the right dlPFC, following a previous study suggesting that continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the right dlPFC can make people more anxious. Based on these results we hypothesized that intermittent TBS (iTBS), which is thought to have opposing effects on plasticity, may reduce anxiety when targeted at the same right dlPFC region. In this double-blinded, cross-over design, 28 healthy subjects underwent 12 study visits over a 4-week period. During each of their 2 stimulation weeks, they received four 600 pulse iTBS sessions (2/day), with a post-stimulation testing session occurring 24 h following the final iTBS session. One week they received active stimulation, one week they received sham. Stimulation weeks were separated by a 1-week washout period and the order of active/sham delivery was counterbalanced across subjects. During the testing session, we induced anxiety using the threat of unpredictable shock and measured anxiety potentiated startle. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, subjects showed increased startle reactivity following active compared to sham stimulation. These results replicate work from our two previous trials suggesting that TMS to the right dlPFC increases anxiety potentiated startle, independent of both the pattern of stimulation and the timing of the post stimulation measure. Although these results confirm a mechanistic link between right dlPFC excitability and startle, capitalizing upon this link for the benefit of patients will require future exploration.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexReflex, StartleTheta RhythmTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAnxietyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFunctional LateralityHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePrefrontal CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38740902
PMCPMC11319663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.