ArticleScientific reports2024
Source identification and driving factor apportionment for soil potentially toxic elements via combining APCS-MLR, UNMIX, PMF and GDM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Residual metal soil contamination and associated health risks in a native American community within a remediated Superfund site in New Jersey, USA.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Heavy Metals Risk Assessment and Source Apportionment in Agricultural Soils of the Central Yunnan Dry-Hot Valley.Toxics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contamination and quantification of soil potentially toxic elements (PTEs) contamination sources and the determination of driving factors are the premise of soil contamination control. In our study, 788 soil samples from the National Agricultural Park in Chengdu, Sichuan Province were used to evaluate the contamination degree of soil PTEs by pollution factors and pollution load index. The source identification of soil PTEs was performed using positive matrix decomposition (PMF), edge analysis (UNMIX) and absolute principal component score-multiple line regression (APCS-MLR). The geo-detector method (GDM) was used to analysis drivers of soil PTEs pollution sources to help interpret pollution sources derived from receptor models. Result shows that soil Cu, Pb, Zn, Cr, Ni, Cd, As and Hg average content were 35.2, 32.3, 108.9, 91.9, 37.1, 0.22, 9.76 and 0.15 mg/kg in this study area. Except for As, all are higher than the corresponding soil background values in Sichuan Province. The best performance of APCS-MLR was determined by comparison, and APCS-MLR was considered as the preferred receptor model for soil PTEs source distribution in the study area. ACPS-MLR results showed that 82.70% of Cu, 61.6% of Pb, 75.3% of Zn, 91.9% of Cr and 89.4% of Ni came from traffic-industrial emission sources, 60.9% of Hg came from domestic-transportation emission sources, 57.7% of Cd came from agricultural sources, and 89.5% of As came from natural sources. The GDM results showed that distance from first grade highway, population, land utilization and total potassium (TK) content were the main driving factors affecting these four sources, with q values of 0.064, 0.048, 0.069 and 0.058, respectively. The results can provide reference for reducing PTEs contamination in farmland soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.