Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38740776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Investigating the growth promotion potential of  biochar on pea (Pisum sativum) plants under saline conditions.

Shahid Fareed, Arslan Haider, Tahrim Ramzan, Muhammad Ahmad, Aqsa Younis, Usman Zulfiqar, Hafeez Ur Rehman, Ejaz Ahmad Waraich, Adeel Abbas, Talha Chaudhary and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shahid FareedDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Arslan HaiderDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Tahrim RamzanDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Muhammad AhmadDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Aqsa YounisDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Usman ZulfiqarDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan. usman.zulfiqar@iub.edu.pk.
Hafeez Ur RehmanDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Ejaz Ahmad WaraichDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Adeel AbbasInstitute of Environment and Ecology, School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Talha ChaudharyFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences 2100, Godollo, Hungary. Chaudhary.Talha@stud.uni-mate.hu.
Walid SoufanPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pea, member of the plant family Leguminosae, play a pivotal role in global food security as essential legumes. However, their production faces challenges stemming from the detrimental impacts of abiotic stressors, leading to a concerning decline in output. Salinity stress is one of the major factors that limiting the growth and productivity of pea. However, biochar amendment in soil has a potential role in alleviating the oxidative damage caused by salinity stress. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the potential role of biochar amendment in soil that may mitigate the adverse effect of salinity stress on pea. The treatments of this study were, (a) Pea varieties; (i) V1 = Meteor and V2 = Green Grass, Salinity Stress, (b) Control (0 mM) and (ii) Salinity (80 mM) (c) Biochar applications; (i) Control, (ii) 8 g/kg soil (56 g) and (iii) 16 g/kg soil (112 g). Salinity stress demonstrated a considerable reduction in morphological parameters as Shoot and root length decreased by (29% and 47%), fresh weight and dry weight of shoot and root by (85, 63%) and (49, 68%), as well as area of leaf reduced by (71%) among both varieties. Photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoid contents decreased under 80 mM salinity up to (41, 63, 55 and 76%) in both varieties as compared to control. Exposure of pea plants to salinity stress increased the oxidative damage by enhancing hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde content by (79 and 89%), while amendment of biochar reduced their activities as, (56% and 59%) in both varieties. The activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD) were increased by biochar applications under salinity stress as, (49, 59, and 86%) as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants as, anthocyanin and flavonoids improved by (112 and 67%). Organic osmolytes such as total soluble proteins, sugars, and glycine betaine were increased up to (57, 83, and 140%) by biochar amendment. Among uptake of mineral ions, shoot and root Na

Indexed as

CharcoalPisum sativumSoilAntioxidantsChlorophyllPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant ShootsSalinitySalt StressAntioxidantsbiocharCharcoalChlorophyllSoilAntioxidantsBiocharPeaSalinity and Oxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID38740776
PMCPMC11091058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.