Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38740707›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

Explanation and Elaboration with Examples for CLEAR (CLEAR-E3): an EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group Initiative.

Burak Kocak, Alessandra Borgheresi, Andrea Ponsiglione, Anna E Andreychenko, Armando Ugo Cavallo, Arnaldo Stanzione, Fabio M Doniselli, Federica Vernuccio, Matthaios Triantafyllou, Roberto Cannella and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Reporting checklists: from a tool after publication to a tool before submission.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reproducibility and interpretability in radiomics: a critical assessmentDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Burak KocakDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Basaksehir, Istanbul, Turkey. drburakkocak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-396X
Alessandra BorgheresiDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-9468
Andrea PonsiglioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0105-935X
Anna E AndreychenkoLaboratory for Digital Public Health Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6359-0763
Armando Ugo CavalloDivision of Radiology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata (IDI) IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-7721
Arnaldo StanzioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-5789
Fabio M DoniselliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2272-7855
Federica VernuccioSection of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnosis (Bi.N.D), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0350-1794
Matthaios TriantafyllouDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110, Crete, Voutes, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-5424
Roberto CannellaSection of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-0785
Romina TrottaDepartment of Radiology - Fatima Hospital, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7161-9795
Samuele GhezzoVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-6759
Tugba Akinci D'AntonoliInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7237-711X
Renato CuocoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-1574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overall quality of radiomics research has been reported as low in literature, which constitutes a major challenge to improve. Consistent, transparent, and accurate reporting is critical, which can be accomplished with systematic use of reporting guidelines. The CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR) was previously developed to assist authors in reporting their radiomic research and to assist reviewers in their evaluation. To take full advantage of CLEAR, further explanation and elaboration of each item, as well as literature examples, may be useful. The main goal of this work, Explanation and Elaboration with Examples for CLEAR (CLEAR-E3), is to improve CLEAR's usability and dissemination. In this international collaborative effort, members of the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics-Radiomics Auditing Group searched radiomics literature to identify representative reporting examples for each CLEAR item. At least two examples, demonstrating optimal reporting, were presented for each item. All examples were selected from open-access articles, allowing users to easily consult the corresponding full-text articles. In addition to these, each CLEAR item's explanation was further expanded and elaborated. For easier access, the resulting document is available at https://radiomic.github.io/CLEAR-E3/ . As a complementary effort to CLEAR, we anticipate that this initiative will assist authors in reporting their radiomics research with greater ease and transparency, as well as editors and reviewers in reviewing manuscripts.Relevance statement Along with the original CLEAR checklist, CLEAR-E3 is expected to provide a more in-depth understanding of the CLEAR items, as well as concrete examples for reporting and evaluating radiomic research.Key points• As a complementary effort to CLEAR, this international collaborative effort aims to assist authors in reporting their radiomics research, as well as editors and reviewers in reviewing radiomics manuscripts.• Based on positive examples from the literature selected by the EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group, each CLEAR item explanation was further elaborated in CLEAR-E3.• The resulting explanation and elaboration document with examples can be accessed at  https://radiomic.github.io/CLEAR-E3/ .

Indexed as

ChecklistDiagnostic ImagingEuropeHumansRadiologyRadiomicsChecklistGuidelineMachine learningRadiomicsReporting

Identifiers

PMID38740707
PMCPMC11091004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.