ArticleNeurocritical care2024
PaCO
Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and risk factors of extremely poor functional outcome after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in octogenarians and nonagenarians- a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- High-altitude hypoxia aggravated neurological deficits in mice induced by traumatic brain injury via BACH1 mediating astrocytic ferroptosis.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Dynamics of anterior pituitary function in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort.Critical care science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPartial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO
methodsThis is a prospective single-center cohort of consecutive patients with TBI admitted to a trauma center located at 2600 m above sea level. An unfavorable outcome was defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) score < 4 at the 6-month follow-up.
resultsWe had a total of 81 patients with complete data, 80% (65/81) were men, and the median (interquartile range) age was 36 (25-50) years. Median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was 9 (6-14); 49% (40/81) of patients had severe TBI (GCS 3-8), 32% (26/81) had moderate TBI (GCS 12-9), and 18% (15/81) had mild TBI (GCS 13-15). The median (interquartile range) Abbreviated Injury Score of the head (AISh) was 3 (2-4). The frequency of an unfavorable outcome (GOSE < 4) was 30% (25/81), the median GOSE was 4 (2-5), and the median 6-month mortality rate was 24% (20/81). Comparison between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes revealed that those with unfavorable outcome were older, (median age 49 [30-72] vs. 29 [22-41] years, P < 0.01), had lower admission GCS scores (6 [4-8] vs. 13 [8-15], P < 0.01), had higher AISh scores (4 [4-4] vs. 3 [2-4], P < 0.01), had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health disease Classification System II scores (17 [15-23] vs. 10 [6-14], P < 0.01), had higher Charlson scores (0 [0-2] vs. 0 [0-0], P < 0.01), and had higher PaCO
conclusionsHigher PaCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.