Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38740576›Full record

GuidelineEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[

Sofia C Vaz, John Patrick Pilkington Woll, Fatima Cardoso, David Groheux, Gary J R Cook, Gary A Ulaner, Heather Jacene, Isabel T Rubio, Jan W Schoones, Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters and 5 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Prognostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic performance ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic value of [Scientific reports · 2026
    Observational
  13. AlEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sofia C VazNuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. sofia.vaz@fundacaochampalimaud.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-9349
John Patrick Pilkington WollPET-CT Department, Clinica Delgado AUNA, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-331X
Fatima CardosoBreast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-2249
David GroheuxNuclear Medicine Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9541-9175
Gary J R CookDepartment of Cancer Imaging, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8732-8134
Gary A UlanerMolecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7953-0113
Heather JaceneDana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7167-078X
Isabel T RubioBreast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0035-0679
Jan W SchoonesDirectorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1120-4781
Marie-Jeanne Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-4257
Philip PoortmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-2293
Ritse M MannRadiology Department, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8111-1930
Stephanie L GraffLifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1928-1722
Elizabeth H DibbleDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. edibble@lifespan.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-6272
Lioe-Fee de Geus-OeiDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. l.f.de_geus-oei@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-2743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is much literature about the role of 2-[ PURPOSE: To provide an organized, international, state-of-the-art, and multidisciplinary guideline, led by experts of two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and representation of important societies in the field of BC (ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA).

methodsLiterature review and expert discussion were performed with the aim of collecting updated information regarding the role of 2-[

resultsQuantitative PET features (SUV, MTV, TLG) are valuable prognostic parameters. In baseline staging, 2-[

conclusion2-[

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFemaleHumansNuclear MedicineSocieties, MedicalFluorodeoxyglucose F182-[18F]FDGBreast cancerEANMNo special typePET/CTSNMMI

Identifiers

PMID38740576
PMCPMC11224102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.