Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38740269›Full record

SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2024

Optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Gopalkumar Rakesh, Patrick Cordero, Rebika Khanal, Seth S Himelhoch, Craig R Rush

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gopalkumar RakeshDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America. Electronic address: gopalkumar.rakesh@uky.edu.
Patrick CorderoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Rebika KhanalUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States of America.
Seth S HimelhochDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.
Craig R RushDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001997 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PENDERGAST, JULIE S, STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2016 to 2025
$4.2M
Optimizing Smoking Cessation interventions for PLWH in Nairobi, KenyaR01CA225419 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HIMELHOCH, SETH S, SHUTER, JONATHAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
A Novel Drug Combination for Alcohol-Use Disorders: A Human Laboratory StudyR01AA026255 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 2018 to 2020
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001997NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225419NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a critical knowledge gap in optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and antidepressants to treat patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). TMS is effective in treating MDD in patients who have failed at least one antidepressant trial, with accelerated protocols showing faster remission in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although clinicians routinely augment antidepressants with TMS, there is a knowledge gap in stopping versus continuing antidepressants or the dosing strategies when starting or tapering TMS. These considerations are important when considering maintenance TMS (delivered alone or in combination with suitable antidepressants) to maintain remission in MDD after the index course of TMS. As the first step towards filling this knowledge gap, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label trials from 2 databases (PubMed/Medline and EMBASE) that compared active TMS combined with a pre-specified antidepressant dosed in the same manner for adults with MDD versus sham TMS combined with the same antidepressant as in the active arm. All studies were published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023. We excluded case reports, case series, and clinical studies that augmented TMS with antidepressants and vice versa. We found 10 RCTs (n = 654 participants) and performed a meta-analysis. This showed active TMS combined with pre-specified antidepressants had greater efficacy for MDD treatment than sham TMS combined with the same antidepressants as in the active arm (Hedge's g = 1; 95 % CI [0.27, 1.73]). The review and meta-analysis indicate greater short-term efficacy in combining antidepressants with TMS from the get-go in MDD. Given the increasing role of accelerated TMS protocols in expediting remission in MDD and the results of our meta-analysis, we advocate for RCTs examining the short-term and long-term effects of various antidepressant classes on these TMS protocols in MDD. This can also optimize and individualize maintenance TMS protocols to prevent relapse in MDD.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsMajor Depressive DisorderTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCombined Modality TherapyDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressantsMajor depressive disorder (MDD)Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID38740269
PMCPMC12044610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.