ArticleBone2024
Super-resolution of clinical CT: Revealing microarchitecture in whole bone clinical CT image data.
Article in Bone, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- TranslatingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Super-resolution X-ray tomography using deep learning applied to the 3D quantification of defects in lattice structures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hip Fractures: Clinical, Biomaterial and Biomechanical Insights into a Common Health Challenge.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Super-Resolution from Normal to Ultra-High Resolution CT: Conditional Diffusion Model Development and Performance Evaluation in Trabecular Bone Radiomics.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporotic fractures, prevalent in the elderly, pose a significant health and economic burden. Current methods for predicting fracture risk, primarily relying on bone mineral density, provide only modest accuracy. If better spatial resolution of trabecular bone in a clinical scan were available, a more complete assessment of fracture risk would be obtained using microarchitectural measures of bone (i.e. trabecular thickness, trabecular spacing, bone volume fraction, etc.). However, increased resolution comes at the cost of increased radiation or can only be applied at small volumes of distal skeletal locations. This study explores super-resolution (SR) technology to enhance clinical CT scans of proximal femurs and better reveal the trabecular microarchitecture of bone. Using a deep-learning-based (i.e. subset of artificial intelligence) SR approach, low-resolution clinical CT images were upscaled to higher resolution and compared to corresponding MicroCT-derived images. SR-derived 2-dimensional microarchitectural measurements, such as degree of anisotropy, bone volume fraction, trabecular spacing, and trabecular thickness were within 16 % error compared to MicroCT data, whereas connectivity density exhibited larger error (as high as 1094 %). SR-derived 3-dimensional microarchitectural metrics exhibited errors <18 %. This work showcases the potential of SR technology to enhance clinical bone imaging and holds promise for improving fracture risk assessments and osteoporosis detection. Further research, including larger datasets and refined techniques, can advance SR's clinical utility, enabling comprehensive microstructural assessment across whole bones, thereby improving fracture risk predictions and patient-specific treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.