Trial reportBlood advances2024
Daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible myeloma: AMaRC 03-16.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Anti-CD38-based quadruplet versus triplet induction regimens in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of daratumumab on patients with high-risk cytogenetic multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Addition of daratumumab to standard triplet regimens achieved better survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The addition of CD38 monoclonal antibody to triplet regimens improves survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of Anti-Clonal Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: Evidence- and Time-Based Comparison with Multiple Myeloma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Addition of anti-CD38 mAb in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: advancing toward quadruplet induction regimens.Blood neoplasia · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of daratumumab-based quadruplet therapy vs non-daratumumab-based triplet therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: A GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Article
- Daratumumab-based quadruplet for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma: Results from the Phase II prospective EMN19 study.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review Integrating Network Meta-Analysis and Real-World Vigilance Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Daratumumab in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cancers · 2025Review
- Prognostic Value of PSMB5 and Correlations with LC3II and Reactive Oxygen Species Levels in the Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells of Bortezomib-Resistant Multiple Myeloma Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Daratumumab Versus Control Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study of Survival Outcomes Among Multiple Myeloma Patients : Survival Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Treatment with Daratumumab.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies-based therapy versus standard therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Article
- Frontline management of multiple myeloma patients: optimizing treatment for patients in the Gulf region.Clinical hematology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIn newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma, daratumumab has improved outcomes when added to the standard-of-care regimens. In a randomized trial, we tested whether similar improvements would be observed when daratumumab was added to the bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD) regimen. Transplant-ineligible patients with untreated myeloma were randomized to receive VCD or VCD plus daratumumab (VCDD). A total of 121 patients were randomized: 57 in the VCD arm and 64 in the VCDD arm. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-21.7) and 25.8 months (95% CI, 19.9-33.5) in the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.67; log-rank test P = .066). In a preplanned analysis, it was demonstrated that the daratumumab-containing arm showed a significant improvement in PFS from 18 months onward, based on estimates at fixed time points after randomization. The proportions of patients who were progression-free at the following time points were: 18 months, 48% vs 68% (P = .0002); 24 months, 36% vs 52% (P = .0001); and 30 months, 27% vs 41% (P < .0001) in the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively. The best overall response and very good partial response rate were significantly higher in the daratumumab arm compared with the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively (65% vs 86%, P = .007; and 28% vs 52%, P = .009). Seventy-two percent of the VCDD patients completed the 9 cycles of induction therapy with no grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy adverse events. This study supports VCDD as an option for the initial treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. This trial was registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000202369).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.