Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739673›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Great genetic diversity of vector-borne bacteria and protozoan in wild rodents from Guangxi, China.

Jing Xue, Si-Si Chen, Rui Jian, Guo-Qing Chen, Xincheng Qin, Miao Lu, Wen Wang, Guang-Cheng Xie, Luanying Du, Kun Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing XueCollege of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Si-Si ChenCollege of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Rui JianCollege of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Guo-Qing ChenYancheng Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Xincheng QinNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Miao LuNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Wen WangNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Guang-Cheng XieCollege of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Luanying DuCollege of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Kun LiNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5316-2703
Wen-Ping GuoCollege of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-179X

Funding

Hebei Natural Science FoundationNational Key Research and Development ProgramScientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Chengde Medical UniversityYoung Talent Program of Higher School in Hebei Province
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRodents are recognized as the hosts of many vector-borne bacteria and protozoan parasites and play an important role in their transmission and maintenance. Intensive studies have focused on their infections in vectors, especially in ticks, however, vector-borne bacterial and protozoan infections in rodents are poorly understood although human cases presenting with fever may due to their infection have been found.

methodsFrom May to October 2019, 192 wild rodents were trapped in wild environment of Guangxi Province, and the spleen samples were collected to reveal the presence of vector-borne bacterial and protozoan infections in them. The microorganisms in rodents were identified by detecting their DNA using (semi-)nested PCR. All the PCR products of the expected size were subjected to sequencing, and then analyzed by BLASTn. Furthermore, all the recovered sequences were subjected to nucleotide identity and phylogenetic analyses.

resultsAs a result, 192 rodents representing seven species were captured, and Bandicota indica were the dominant species, followed by Rattus andamanensis. Based on the (semi-)nested PCR, our results suggested that Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma capra, Anaplasma ovis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis", "Candidatus E. hainanensis", "Candidatus E. zunyiensis", three uncultured Ehrlichia spp., Bartonella coopersplainsensis, Bartonella tribocorum, Bartonella rattimassiliensis, Bartonella silvatica, two uncultured Bartonella spp., Babesia microti and diverse Hepatozoon were identified in six rodent species. More importantly, six species (including two Anaplasma, two Bartonella, "Ca. N. mikurensis" and Bab. microti) are zoonotic pathogens except Anaplasma bovis and Anaplasma ovis with zoonotic potential. Furthermore, dual infection was observed between different microorganisms, and the most common type of co-infection is between "Ca. N. mikurensis" and other microorganisms. Additionally, potential novel Bartonella species and Hepatozoon species demonstrated the presence of more diverse rodent-associated Bartonella and Hepatozoon.

conclusionsThe results in this work indicated great genetic diversity of vector-borne infections in wild rodents, and highlighted the potential risk of human pathogens transmitted from rodents to humans through vectors.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationRodentiaAnaplasmaAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteriaBartonellaChinaPhylogenyRatsVector Borne Diseases

Identifiers

PMID38739673
PMCPMC11115304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.