ArticlePloS one2024
Characterizing medical patients with delirium: A cohort study comparing ICD-10 codes and a validated chart review method.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuropsychiatric Involvement in Hospitalized COVID-19 Is Embedded in Multi-Organ Disease: A Retrospective Five-Axis Record-Derived Phenotype Atlas with Renal-Urinary Prognostic Dominance.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of cognitive impairment on postoperative delirium and discharge disposition following knee arthroplasty: a Japanese nationwide propensity score-matched study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Association of Frailty and Delirium with Hospitalization Outcomes Among Older Adults With Rheumatic Diseases.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and the risk of delirium - a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Association of propofol vs. sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia with postoperative delirium, cognitive decline, and mortality in older adults: a global comparative-effectiveness study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Postoperative Delirium After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the United States, 2016-2021: Trends, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2026Observational
- Comparative risk of delirium among opioid users for non-cancer pain: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium in children with congenital heart disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors for post-stroke delirium in the elderly: A national inpatient sample (NIS) analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Trends in Proportion of Delirium Among Older Emergency Department Patients in South Korea, 2017-2022.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Association of Inpatient Prescribing of First-Generation Antihistamines With Delirium in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- External validation of the American heart association's PREVENT equations in predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk among Arab women and men: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a major cause of preventable mortality and morbidity in hospitalized adults, but accurately determining rates of delirium remains a challenge.
objectiveTo characterize and compare medical inpatients identified as having delirium using two common methods, administrative data and retrospective chart review.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 3881 randomly selected internal medicine hospital admissions from six acute care hospitals in Toronto and Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Delirium status was determined using ICD-10-CA codes from hospital administrative data and through a previously validated chart review method. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, processes of care and outcomes were compared across those without delirium in hospital and those with delirium as determined by administrative data and chart review.
resultsDelirium was identified in 6.3% of admissions by ICD-10-CA codes compared to 25.7% by chart review. Using chart review as the reference standard, ICD-10-CA codes for delirium had sensitivity 24.1% (95%CI: 21.5-26.8%), specificity 99.8% (95%CI: 99.5-99.9%), positive predictive value 97.6% (95%CI: 94.6-98.9%), and negative predictive value 79.2% (95%CI: 78.6-79.7%). Age over 80, male gender, and Charlson comorbidity index greater than 2 were associated with misclassification of delirium. Inpatient mortality and median costs of care were greater in patients determined to have delirium by ICD-10-CA codes (5.8% greater mortality, 95% CI: 2.0-9.5 and $6824 greater cost, 95%CI: 4713-9264) and by chart review (11.9% greater mortality, 95%CI: 9.5-14.2% and $4967 greater cost, 95%CI: 4415-5701), compared to patients without delirium.
conclusionsAdministrative data are specific but highly insensitive, missing most cases of delirium in hospital. Mortality and costs of care were greater for both the delirium cases that were detected and missed by administrative data. Better methods of routinely measuring delirium in hospital are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.