Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739642›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Artificial neural network, machine learning modelling of compressive strength of recycled coarse aggregate based self-compacting concrete.

P Jagadesh, Afzal Hussain Khan, B Shanmuga Priya, A Asheeka, Zineb Zoubir, Hassan M Magbool, Shamshad Alam, Omer Y Bakather

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P JagadeshDepartment of Civil Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.ORCID 0000-0002-9803-748X
Afzal Hussain KhanCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
B Shanmuga PriyaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.
A AsheekaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.
Zineb ZoubirGreen Energy Park (IRESEN, UM6P), km2 R206, Benguerir, Morocco.
Hassan M MagboolCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Shamshad AlamCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Omer Y BakatherDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research study aims to understand the application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to forecast the Self-Compacting Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete (SCRCAC) compressive strength. From different literature, 602 available data sets from SCRCAC mix designs are collected, and the data are rearranged, reconstructed, trained and tested for the ANN model development. The models were established using seven input variables: the mass of cementitious content, water, natural coarse aggregate content, natural fine aggregate content, recycled coarse aggregate content, chemical admixture and mineral admixture used in the SCRCAC mix designs. Two normalization techniques are used for data normalization to visualize the data distribution. For each normalization technique, three transfer functions are used for modelling. In total, six different types of models were run in MATLAB and used to estimate the 28th day SCRCAC compressive strength. Normalization technique 2 performs better than 1 and TANSING is the best transfer function. The best k-fold cross-validation fold is k = 7. The coefficient of determination for predicted and actual compressive strength is 0.78 for training and 0.86 for testing. The impact of the number of neurons and layers on the model was performed. Inputs from standards are used to forecast the 28th day compressive strength. Apart from ANN, Machine Learning (ML) techniques like random forest, extra trees, extreme boosting and light gradient boosting techniques are adopted to predict the 28th day compressive strength of SCRCAC. Compared to ML, ANN prediction shows better results in terms of sensitive analysis. The study also extended to determine 28th day compressive strength from experimental work and compared it with 28th day compressive strength from ANN best model. Standard and ANN mix designs have similar fresh and hardened properties. The average compressive strength from ANN model and experimental results are 39.067 and 38.36 MPa, respectively with correlation coefficient is 1. It appears that ANN can validly predict the compressive strength of concrete.

Indexed as

Compressive StrengthConstruction MaterialsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRecycling

Identifiers

PMID38739642
PMCPMC11090367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.