Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739557›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A multifaceted suite of metrics for comparative myoelectric prosthesis controller research.

Heather E Williams, Ahmed W Shehata, Kodi Y Cheng, Jacqueline S Hebert, Patrick M Pilarski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantifying the Cognitive Demand of Controlling a Prosthesis with a Secondary Detection Response Task.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather E WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8051-3751
Ahmed W ShehataDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8442-9901
Kodi Y ChengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jacqueline S HebertDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0788-0568
Patrick M PilarskiAlberta Machine Intelligence Institute (Amii), Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1686-2978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb robotic (myoelectric) prostheses are technologically advanced, but challenging to use. In response, substantial research is being done to develop person-specific prosthesis controllers that can predict a user's intended movements. Most studies that test and compare new controllers rely on simple assessment measures such as task scores (e.g., number of objects moved across a barrier) or duration-based measures (e.g., overall task completion time). These assessment measures, however, fail to capture valuable details about: the quality of device arm movements; whether these movements match users' intentions; the timing of specific wrist and hand control functions; and users' opinions regarding overall device reliability and controller training requirements. In this work, we present a comprehensive and novel suite of myoelectric prosthesis control evaluation metrics that better facilitates analysis of device movement details-spanning measures of task performance, control characteristics, and user experience. As a case example of their use and research viability, we applied these metrics in real-time control experimentation. Here, eight participants without upper limb impairment compared device control offered by a deep learning-based controller (recurrent convolutional neural network-based classification with transfer learning, or RCNN-TL) to that of a commonly used controller (linear discriminant analysis, or LDA). The participants wore a simulated prosthesis and performed complex functional tasks across multiple limb positions. Analysis resulting from our suite of metrics identified 16 instances of a user-facing problem known as the "limb position effect". We determined that RCNN-TL performed the same as or significantly better than LDA in four such problem instances. We also confirmed that transfer learning can minimize user training burden. Overall, this study contributes a multifaceted new suite of control evaluation metrics, along with a guide to their application, for use in research and testing of myoelectric controllers today, and potentially for use in broader rehabilitation technologies of the future.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsElectromyographyAdultDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMovementNeural Networks, ComputerProsthesis DesignRoboticsUpper ExtremityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38739557
PMCPMC11090368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.