Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739465›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

Quantifying the Hardness of Bioactivity Prediction Tasks for Transfer Learning.

Hosein Fooladi, Steffen Hirte, Johannes Kirchmair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hosein FooladiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Steffen HirteDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Johannes KirchmairDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-5877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, machine learning methods are widely employed in drug discovery. However, the chronic lack of data continues to hamper their further development, validation, and application. Several modern strategies aim to mitigate the challenges associated with data scarcity by learning from data on related tasks. These knowledge-sharing approaches encompass transfer learning, multitask learning, and meta-learning. A key question remaining to be answered for these approaches is about the extent to which their performance can benefit from the relatedness of available source (training) tasks; in other words, how difficult ("hard") a test task is to a model, given the available source tasks. This study introduces a new method for quantifying and predicting the hardness of a bioactivity prediction task based on its relation to the available training tasks. The approach involves the generation of protein and chemical representations and the calculation of distances between the bioactivity prediction task and the available training tasks. In the example of meta-learning on the FS-Mol data set, we demonstrate that the proposed task hardness metric is inversely correlated with performance (Pearson's correlation coefficient

Indexed as

Machine LearningDrug DiscoveryHumans

Identifiers

PMID38739465
PMCPMC11134514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.