ArticleJAMA network open2024
Health Service Use and Costs During Pregnancy Among Privately Insured Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19-Related Healthcare Utilization and Costs in a Large Insured US Population, 2021-2025.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Observational
- Fetal and Obstetric Complications Among Pregnant Women With Congenital Heart Disease in a Georgia Medicaid Dataset.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national burden and trends of congenital birth defects from 1990 to 2021: epidemiological trends, health inequalities, and COVID-19 impact.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Variations in Incidence and Financial Burdens of Nonpancreatic Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Adverse Events.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Burden and cost of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis among commercially insured people undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) are increasingly reaching childbearing age, are more prone to adverse pregnancy events, and uncommonly undergo recommended cardiac evaluations. Data to better understand resource allocation and financial planning are lacking. Objective: To examine health care use and costs for patients with CHD during pregnancy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, using Merative MarketScan commercial insurance data. Participants included patients with CHD and those without CHD matched 1:1 by age, sex, and insurance enrollment year. Pregnancy claims were identified for all participants. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to March 2024. Exposures: Baseline characteristics (age, US region, delivery year, insurance type) and pregnancy-related events (obstetric, cardiac, and noncardiac conditions; birth outcomes; and cesarean delivery). Main Outcomes and Measures: Health service use (outpatient physician, nonphysician, emergency department, prescription drugs, and admissions) and costs (total and out-of-pocket costs adjusted for inflation to represent 2024 US dollars). Results: A total of 11 703 pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 31.5 [5.4] years) were studied, with 2267 pregnancies in 1785 patients with CHD (492 pregnancies in patients with severe CHD and 1775 in patients with nonsevere CHD) and 9436 pregnancies in 7720 patients without CHD. Compared with patients without CHD, pregnancies in patients with CHD were associated with significantly higher health care use (standardized mean difference [SMD] range, 0.16-1.46) and cost (SMD range, 0.14-0.55) except for out-of-pocket inpatient and ED costs. After adjustment for covariates, having CHD was independently associated with higher total (adjusted cost ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.57-1.84) and out-of-pocket (adjusted cost ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22-1.58) costs. The adjusted mean total costs per pregnancy were $15 971 (95% CI, $15 480-$16 461) for patients without CHD, $24 290 (95% CI, $22 773-$25 806) for patients with any CHD, $26 308 (95% CI, $22 788-$29 828) for patients with severe CHD, and $23 750 (95% CI, $22 110-$25 390) for patients with nonsevere CHD. Patients with vs without CHD incurred $8319 and $700 higher total and out-of-pocket costs per pregnancy, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides novel, clinically relevant estimates for the cardio-obstetric team, patients with CHD, payers, and policymakers regarding health care and financial planning. These estimates can be used to carefully plan for and advocate for the comprehensive resources needed to care for patients with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.