ArticleJAMA network open2024
Telehealth Expansion and Medicare Beneficiaries' Care Quality and Access.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Interventions for Self-Management of Tinnitus: Update of a Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Health Readiness and Medicare Primary Care Spending: Nationwide County-Level Observational Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Telehealth use among US adults with type 2 diabetes: differences in medication fill patterns and care processes.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Primary Care Telehealth and Patient Utilization, Quality, and Spending in Traditional Medicare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring Adoption for Hypertension Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Telehealth Use Among Older Adults Receiving Home- and Community-Based Services: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disabilities Survey.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Predictors of Missed Appointments in Digestive Health: A Comparative Analysis of Telehealth and In-Person Visits.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Telemedicine Adoption, US Ambulatory Visits, and Total Medical Spending, 2019-2023.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Telehealth Use and Modality Choice Among US Adults: Shorrocks-Shapley Decomposition of a 2022 Cross-Sectional National Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Sex differences in the influence of weight bias internalization on preferences for telehealth utilization among people with obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Episode Charges and Subsequent Visits After Telemedicine vs In-Person Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Digital infrastructure and proxies of ambulatory care access in Russia, 2018-2024: a regional panel study with a national telemedicine signal analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- From Expansion to Expiration: Federal Policy Waivers and Telehealth Utilization in US Primary Care (2016-2024).Advances in health information science and practice · 2026Article
- The volume of outpatient office visits did not increase for specialties that were more likely to adopt telehealth.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude and readiness toward telehealth among nursing staff: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Managing Patient Demand in a Value-Based System.Annals of family medicine · 2025Article
- The association of neighborhood-level deprivation with glioblastoma outcomes: a single center cohort study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Utilization and patient experiences of telehealth among Medicaid expansion enrollees.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Primary care telehealth in a dynamic healthcare environment from digital divide to healthcare outcomes.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Utilization and quality among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with high vs low access to telehealth.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Understanding the association of telehealth use with health care outcomes is fundamental to determining whether telehealth waivers implemented during the COVID-19 public health emergency should be made permanent. The current literature has yielded inconclusive findings owing to its focus on select states, practices, or health care systems. Objective: To estimate the association of telehealth use with outcomes for all Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries by comparing hospital service areas (HSAs) with different levels of telehealth use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This US population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 2022 to April 2023. Participants included Medicare claims of beneficiaries attributed to HSAs with FFS enrollment in Parts A and B. Exposures: Low, medium, or high tercile of telehealth use created by ranking HSAs according to the number of telehealth visits per 1000 beneficiaries. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were quality (ambulatory care-sensitive [ACS] hospitalizations and emergency department [ED] visits per 1000 FFS beneficiaries), access to care (clinician encounters per FFS beneficiary), and cost (total cost of care for Part A and/or B services per FFS Medicare beneficiary) determined with a difference-in-difference analysis. Results: In this cohort study of claims from approximately 30 million Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age in 2019, 71.04 [1.67] years; mean [SD] percentage female in 2019, 53.83% [2.14%]) within 3436 HSAs, between the second half of 2019 and the second half of 2021, mean ACS hospitalizations and ED visits declined sharply, mean clinician encounters per beneficiary declined slightly, and mean total cost of care per beneficiary per semester increased slightly. Compared with the low group, the high group had more ACS hospitalizations (1.63 additional hospitalizations per 1000 beneficiaries; 95% CI, 1.03-2.22 hospitalizations), more clinician encounters (0.30 additional encounters per beneficiary per semester; 95% CI, 0.23-0.38 encounters), and higher total cost of care ($164.99 higher cost per beneficiary per semester; 95% CI, $101.03-$228.96). There was no statistically significant difference in ACS ED visits between the low and high groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries across all 3436 HSAs, high levels of telehealth use were associated with more clinician encounters, more ACS hospitalizations, and higher total health care costs. COVID-19 cases were still high during the period of study, which suggests that these findings partially reflect a higher capacity for providing health services in HSAs with higher telehealth intensity than other HSAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.