Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38739345›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Gafchromic EBT3 film provides equivalent dosimetric performance to EBT-XD film for stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry.

Lloyd Smyth, Andrew Alves, Katherine Collins, Sabeena Beveridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lloyd SmythAustralian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency, Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Yallambie, VIC, Australia.
Andrew AlvesAustralian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency, Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Yallambie, VIC, Australia.
Katherine CollinsAustralian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency, Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Yallambie, VIC, Australia.
Sabeena BeveridgeAustralian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency, Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Yallambie, VIC, Australia. sabeena.beveridge@arpansa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-1472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate assessment of film results is highly dependent on the methodology and techniques used to process film. This study aims to compare the performance of EBT3 and EBT-XD film for SRS dosimetry using two different film processing methods. Experiments were performed in a solid water slab and an anthropomorphic head phantom. For each experiment, the net optical density of the film was calculated using two different methods; taking the background (initial) optical density from 1) an unirradiated film from the same film lot as the irradiated film (stock to stock (S-S) method), and 2) a scan of the same piece of film taken prior to irradiation (film to film (F-F) method). EBT3 and EBT-XD performed similarly across the suite of experiments when using the green channel only or with triple channel RGB dosimetry. The dosimetric performance of EBT-XD was improved across all colour channels by using an F-F method, particularly for the blue channel. In contrast, EBT3 performed similarly well regardless of the net optical density method used. Across 21 SRS treatment plans, the average per-pixel agreement between EBT3 and EBT-XD films, normalised to the 20 Gy prescription dose, was within 2% and 4% for the non-target (2-10 Gy) and target (> 10 Gy) regions, respectively, when using the F-F method. At doses relevant to SRS, EBT3 provides comparable dosimetric performance to EBT-XD. In addition, an S-S dosimetry method is suitable for EBT3 while an F-F method should be adopted if using EBT-XD.

Indexed as

Film DosimetryPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryCalibrationHumansAuditDosimetryEBT3EBT-XDFilmRadiochromic filmStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38739345
PMCPMC11408406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.