ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024
Developing national cancer survivorship standards to inform quality of care in the United States using a consensus approach.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How prevalent is fear of cancer recurrence beyond 5 years: a systematic review of validated assessments across tumour types.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation after discharge in survivors of esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers: a systematic review.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Pooled it
- Survivorship Care After Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review of Reported Barriers and Facilitators.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- ConquerFear-HK: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Metacognition-Based, Manualized Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence among Chinese Cancer Survivors.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2026Trial
- Impact of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome-Informed Clinical Decision Support Tool on Clinical Discussions With Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Findings From the HN-STAR Randomized Controlled Trial (WF-1805CD).JCO oncology practice · 2025Trial
- Supporting implementation of the national standards for cancer survivorship care: development of the cancer survivorship maturity model (CSMM).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- A mixed-methods study characterizing patient experiences with digital survivorship services and preferences for care at a rural cancer center.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Cancer survivorship care among head and neck cancer patients living in rural and urban locations.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Financial concerns: a critical gap in survivors' experience of the implementation of the national standards for cancer survivorship care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- A mixed methods study of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and their utilization of a survivorship clinic: Barriers and facilitators.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- The national standards for cancer survivorship care in action: caregiver experiences across stage, phase, and geography.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Advancing the national standards for cancer survivorship care: overview, early implementation insights, and future directions.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Financial Toxicity Among Disaggregated Asian American Cancer Survivors.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: a clinical practice review for healthcare providers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Characterizing primary care in breast cancer survivors after completion of cancer therapy.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Designing for Autonomous Motivation: Qualitative Interview Study on Pre-Enrollment Preferences of Survivors of Cancer for Digital Health Behavior Change Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Implementation Readiness for National Cancer Survivorship Care Standards.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Beyond surgical risk: Multidimensional predictors of postoperative arm morbidity after breast cancer treatment.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Overseas Care and Cancer Survivorship in Small Island Developing States of the Eastern Caribbean: Protocol for a Multicountry Mixed Methods Study (CaSIDEC Study).JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Are age and sex associated with variation in use of follow-up care and financial barriers to care in U.S. cancer survivors?Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop United States (US) standards for survivorship care that informs (1) essential health system policy and process components and (2) evaluation of the quality of survivorship care.
methodsThe National Cancer Institute and the Department of Veterans Affairs led a review to identify indicators of quality cancer survivorship care in the domains of health system policy, process, and evaluation/assessment. A series of three virtual consensus meetings with survivorship care and research experts and advocates was conducted to rate the importance of the indicators and refine the top indicators. The final set of standards was developed, including ten indicators in each domain.
resultsPrioritized items were survivor-focused, including processes to both assess and manage physical, psychological, and social issues, and evaluation of patient outcomes and experiences. Specific indicators focused on developing a business model for sustaining survivorship care and collecting relevant business metrics (e.g., healthcare utilization, downstream revenue) to show value of survivorship care to health systems.
conclusionsThe National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care can be used by health systems to guide development of new survivorship care programs or services or to assess alignment and enhance services in existing survivorship programs. Given the variety of settings providing care to survivors, it is necessary for health systems to adapt these standards based on factors including age-specific needs, cancer types, treatments received, and health system resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: With over 18 million cancer survivors in the United States, many of whom experience varied symptoms and unmet needs, it is essential for health systems to have a comprehensive strategy to provide ongoing care. The US National Standards for Survivorship Care should serve as a blueprint for what survivors and their families can anticipate after a cancer diagnosis to address their needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.