Observational studyRheumatology international2024
Cranial and extracranial manifestations of giant cell arteritis: a single-center observational study.
Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic heterogeneity of giant cell arteritis in an Asian cohort: clinical, imaging, and laboratory characteristics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The role of calprotectin in giant cell arteritis - from pathophysiology to possible clinical applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant cell arteritis (GCA) presents two major phenotypes - cranial (cGCA) and extracranial (exGCA). exGCA may be overlooked. The study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics between cGCA and exGCA.
methodsElectronic medical records of patients treated between January 2015 and July 2023 at the Department of Rheumatology were searched for the diagnosis of GCA. The clinical characteristics of patients with cGCA, exGCA, and overlapping GCA manifestations were compared.
resultsOut of 32 patients with GCA, 20 had cGCA, 7 had exGCA, and 5 had overlap manifestations. The groups did not differ significantly in demographics, clinical signs/symptoms, or laboratory test results. Importantly, the combined group of patients with exGCA and overlap GCA had a statistically significant delay in initiating treatment (median 12 weeks) compared to patients with cGCA (median 4 weeks; p = 0.008).
conclusionOur study confirmed the insidious nature of exGCA, which lacks distinctive clinical symptoms and consequently leads to delayed treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.