ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Identification of Molecular Subtypes Associated with PCD in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Analysis of Immune Microenvironment.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly fatal malignancy with increasing incidence, and programmed cell death (PCD) plays an important role in homeostasis.
aimsThis study aimed to explore the ESCC of heterogeneity based on the PCD signatures for the diagnosis and treatment of patients.
methodsThe clinical information and RNA-seq data of patients with ESCC and the PCD-related genes set were used to identify PCD signatures.The "limma" package was used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). "Clusterprofiler" package was used for function enrichment analysis, and the "ConsensusClusterPlus" package was performed for consensus clustering. Finally, the "GSVA" package and the Cibersort algorithm were used for the immune infiltration analysis.
resultsWe performed differential expression analysis between ESCC and normal samples and identified 1659 DEGs, of which 124 DEGs were PCD genes. Then, the patients were divided into cluster1 and cluster2 based on the expression of 124 PCD genes. There was a significant difference in immune infiltration between the two clusters. The patients in cluster 1 had a higher immune score and more CD56dim natural killer cells, monocytes, activated CD4 T cells, eosinophil, and activated B cells infiltration, while cluster2 had a higher stromal score, more immune regulation, and immune checkpoint genes expression.
conclusionWe identified two clusters based on PCD gene expression and characterized their tumor microenvironment and immune checkpoint difference. Our findings may provide some new insight into the treatment of ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38738730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.