Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738669›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

The importance of the simulated wound fluid composition and properties in the determination of the fluid handling performance of wound dressings.

Anna U Svensby, Erik Nygren, Amit Gefen, Breda Cullen, Åsa M Ronkvist, AnnBritt Gergely, Marina D Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Gellan Gum/Alginate Films Containing BiogenicMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna U SvensbyWound Care Research and Development, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4578-5546
Erik NygrenWound Care Research and Development, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-4622
Amit GefenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-7218
Breda CullenRedC Consultancy, Bradford, UK.
Åsa M RonkvistWound Care Research and Development, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
AnnBritt GergelyWound Care Research and Development, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marina D CraigWound Care Research and Development, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5860-7644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective fluid handling by wound dressings is crucial in the management of exuding wounds through maintaining a clean, moist environment, facilitating healing by removing excess exudate and promoting tissue regeneration. In this context, the availability of reliable and clinically relevant standardised testing methods for wound dressings are critical for informed decision making by clinicians, healthcare administrators, regulatory/reimbursement bodies and product developers. The widely used standard EN 13726 specifies the use of Solution A, an aqueous protein-free salt solution, for determining fluid-handling capacity (FHC). However, a simulated wound fluid (SWF) with a more complex composition, resembling the protein, salt, and buffer concentrations found in real-world clinical exudate, would provide a more clinically relevant dressing performance assessment. This study compared selected physicochemical parameters of Solution A, an alternative, novel simulated wound fluid (SWF A), and a benchmark reference serum-containing solution (SCS) simulating chronic wound exudate. Additionally, FHC values for eight advanced bordered and non-bordered foam dressings were determined for all three test fluids, following EN 13726. Our findings demonstrate a close resemblance between SWF A and SCS. This study highlights the critical importance of selecting a physiochemically appropriate test fluid for accurate FHC testing resulting in clinically meaningful evaluation of dressing performance.

Indexed as

BandagesExudates and TransudatesWound HealingWounds and InjuriesHumansEN 13726:2023exudate compositionfluid handling capacitysimulated wound fluidwound dressings

Identifiers

PMID38738669
PMCPMC11089840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.