ReviewStroke2024
Twenty Years of Get With The Guidelines-Stroke: Celebrating Past Successes, Lessons Learned, and Future Challenges.
Review in Stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Adaptive Physical Activity Study in Stroke (TAPAS): A Feasibility Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Trial
- Social determinants of health and stroke care and outcomes: SEQUINS lecture 2025.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Tenecteplase vs Alteplase and Time to Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- P2Y12 Inhibitors and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Prevention in stroke - Current state, present gaps and probable next steps.Neurological research and practice · 2026Review
- Implementation Science Symposium: Moving the Needle in Epilepsy Care.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Public Reporting of Quality and Clinical Outcomes in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Rethinking Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention in the Digital Era: Patient Empowerment, Adherence and Optimisation of Guideline-based Care.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure: Twenty Years in Review, Lessons Learned, and the Road Ahead.Circulation. Heart failure · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Large Language Models to Identify Stroke Subtypes Within Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data.Stroke · 2025Article
- Trends in Risk Factor Management Among Stroke Survivors in a Representative US Population.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025Article
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality Improvement.JAMA neurology · 2025Article
- Risk and impact of stroke across 38 countries and territories of the Americas from 1990 to 2021: a population-based trends analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Striving toward quality metrics for pediatric stroke: time from door to diagnosis.Frontiers in stroke · 2025Article
- The Lithuanian Stroke Database: selection of national stroke care performance measures.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Prehospital telemedicine support for urban stroke care: Analysis of current state of care and conceptualization.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program which, began 20 years ago, is one of the largest and most important nationally representative disease registries in the United States. Its importance to the stroke community can be gauged by its sustained growth and widespread dissemination of findings that demonstrate sustained increases in both the quality of care and patient outcomes over time. The objectives of this narrative review are to provide a brief history of Get With The Guidelines-Stroke, summarize its major successes and impact, and highlight lessons learned. Looking to the next 20 years, we discuss potential challenges and opportunities for the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.