Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738341›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Extending Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech to the Sound-Field.

Florine L Bachmann, Joshua P Kulasingham, Kasper Eskelund, Martin Enqvist, Emina Alickovic, Hamish Innes-Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florine L BachmannEriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6731-6032
Joshua P KulasinghamAutomatic Control, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-9160
Kasper EskelundOticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6576-1930
Martin EnqvistAutomatic Control, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Emina AlickovicEriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark.
Hamish Innes-BrownEriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-2823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a valuable clinical tool for objective hearing assessment, which is conventionally detected by averaging neural responses to thousands of short stimuli. Progressing beyond these unnatural stimuli, brainstem responses to continuous speech presented via earphones have been recently detected using linear temporal response functions (TRFs). Here, we extend earlier studies by measuring subcortical responses to continuous speech presented in the sound-field, and assess the amount of data needed to estimate brainstem TRFs. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded from 24 normal hearing participants while they listened to clicks and stories presented via earphones and loudspeakers. Subcortical TRFs were computed after accounting for non-linear processing in the auditory periphery by either stimulus rectification or an auditory nerve model. Our results demonstrated that subcortical responses to continuous speech could be reliably measured in the sound-field. TRFs estimated using auditory nerve models outperformed simple rectification, and 16 minutes of data was sufficient for the TRFs of all participants to show clear wave V peaks for both earphones and sound-field stimuli. Subcortical TRFs to continuous speech were highly consistent in both earphone and sound-field conditions, and with click ABRs. However, sound-field TRFs required slightly more data (16 minutes) to achieve clear wave V peaks compared to earphone TRFs (12 minutes), possibly due to effects of room acoustics. By investigating subcortical responses to sound-field speech stimuli, this study lays the groundwork for bringing objective hearing assessment closer to real-life conditions, which may lead to improved hearing evaluations and smart hearing technologies.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemSpeech PerceptionAdultAuditory ThresholdCochlear NerveFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adultauditory brainstem responseelectroencephalographyneural speech processingspeech ABRtemporal response function

Identifiers

PMID38738341
PMCPMC11092544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.