Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738262›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Enhanced recovery after chest wall resection and reconstruction: a clinical practice review.

Céline Forster, Valentin Jacques, Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold, Thorsten Krueger, Jean Yannis Perentes, Matthieu Zellweger, Michel Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Céline Forster *Service of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Valentin Jacques *Service of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Etienne Abdelnour-BerchtoldService of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thorsten KruegerService of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean Yannis PerentesService of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Matthieu ZellwegerService of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michel GonzalezService of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, and Henrik Kehlet's hypothesis that a reduction of the body's stress response to major surgeries could decrease postoperative morbidity, "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) care pathways have been streamlined. They are now well accepted and considered standard in many surgical disciplines. Yet, to this day, there is no specific ERAS protocol for chest wall resections (CWRs), the removal of a full-thickness portion of the chest wall, including muscle, bone and possibly skin. This is most unfortunate because these are high-risk surgeries, which carry high morbidity rates. In this review, we propose an overview of the current key elements of the ERAS guidelines for thoracic surgery that might apply to CWRs. A successful ERAS pathway for CWR patients would entail, as is the standard approach, three parts: pre-, peri- and postoperative elements. Preoperative items would include specific information, targeted patient education, involvement of all members of the team, including the plastic surgeons, smoking cessation, dedicated nutrition and carbohydrate loading. Perioperative items would likely be standard for thoracotomy patients, namely carefully selective pre-anesthesia sedative medication only in some rare instances, low-molecular-weight heparin throughout, antibiotic prophylaxis, minimization of postoperative nausea and vomiting, avoidance of fluid overload and of urinary drainage. Postoperative elements would include early mobilization and feeding, swift discontinuation of intravenous fluid supply and chest tube removal as soon as safe. Optimal pain management throughout also appears to be critical to minimize the risk of respiratory complications. Together, all these items are achievable and may hold the key to successful introduction of ERAS pathways to the benefit of CWR patients.

Indexed as

chest wall reconstructionchest wall resection (CWR)Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

Identifiers

PMID38738262
PMCPMC11087605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.