Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738250›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Machine learning in cardiac surgery: a narrative review.

Travis J Miles, Ravi K Ghanta

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06594484 (Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Versus Conventional Models for Predicting Erythrocyte Need in Cardiovascular Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06594484 completednot on this map

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Versus Conventional Models for Predicting Erythrocyte Need in Cardiovascular Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorKocaeli City HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled430ConditionsErythrocyte Transfusion, Machine LearningArmsMl Based Algorithm 1, Ml Based Algroithm 2, Bleeding Scores
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From innovation to implementation: Addressing the AI adoption gap in cardiac surgery.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Travis J MilesMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2687-2380
Ravi K GhantaMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Research Training Program in Cardiovascular SurgeryT32HL139430 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Todd K Rosengart · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL139430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being utilized to provide data driven solutions to challenges in medicine. Within the field of cardiac surgery, ML methods have been employed as risk stratification tools to predict a variety of operative outcomes. However, the clinical utility of ML in this domain is unclear. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of ML in cardiac surgery, particularly with regards to its utility in predictive analytics and implications for use in clinical decision support. Methods: We performed a narrative review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed since 2000 using the MeSH terms "Machine Learning", "Supervised Machine Learning", "Deep Learning", or "Artificial Intelligence" and "Cardiovascular Surgery" or "Thoracic Surgery". Key Content and Findings: ML methods have been widely used to generate pre-operative risk profiles, consistently resulting in the accurate prediction of clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery. However, improvement in predictive performance over traditional risk metrics has proven modest and current applications in the clinical setting remain limited. Conclusions: Studies utilizing high volume, multidimensional data such as that derived from electronic health record (EHR) data appear to best demonstrate the advantages of ML methods. Models trained on post cardiac surgery intensive care unit data demonstrate excellent predictive performance and may provide greater clinical utility if incorporated as clinical decision support tools. Further development of ML models and their integration into EHR's may result in dynamic clinical decision support strategies capable of informing clinical care and improving outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Cardiac surgerycritical caredata sciencemachine learning (ML)

Identifiers

PMID38738250
PMCPMC11087616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.