ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Machine learning in cardiac surgery: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06594484 (Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Versus Conventional Models for Predicting Erythrocyte Need in Cardiovascular Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Versus Conventional Models for Predicting Erythrocyte Need in Cardiovascular Surgery
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery and Surgical Training: Opportunities, Risks, and Safeguards for Preserving Expertise.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting acute kidney injury in adults after cardiac surgery with a novel clinical metric: The cardiac diuretic-responsiveness index.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Center-Specific Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification Following Mitral Valve Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From innovation to implementation: Addressing the AI adoption gap in cardiac surgery.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Cardiac surgery in Chile: preoperative risk characterization and analytical outcomes pre-operative risk characterization in cardiac surgeries.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Web-Based Platform for the Chilean Cardiac Surgery Registry: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based analysis of factors influencing surgical duration in type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Safety regulation of machine learning in cardiac surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being utilized to provide data driven solutions to challenges in medicine. Within the field of cardiac surgery, ML methods have been employed as risk stratification tools to predict a variety of operative outcomes. However, the clinical utility of ML in this domain is unclear. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of ML in cardiac surgery, particularly with regards to its utility in predictive analytics and implications for use in clinical decision support. Methods: We performed a narrative review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed since 2000 using the MeSH terms "Machine Learning", "Supervised Machine Learning", "Deep Learning", or "Artificial Intelligence" and "Cardiovascular Surgery" or "Thoracic Surgery". Key Content and Findings: ML methods have been widely used to generate pre-operative risk profiles, consistently resulting in the accurate prediction of clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery. However, improvement in predictive performance over traditional risk metrics has proven modest and current applications in the clinical setting remain limited. Conclusions: Studies utilizing high volume, multidimensional data such as that derived from electronic health record (EHR) data appear to best demonstrate the advantages of ML methods. Models trained on post cardiac surgery intensive care unit data demonstrate excellent predictive performance and may provide greater clinical utility if incorporated as clinical decision support tools. Further development of ML models and their integration into EHR's may result in dynamic clinical decision support strategies capable of informing clinical care and improving outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.