ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Automatic 3D coronary artery segmentation based on local region active contour model.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Robust Blood Vessel Segmentation Technique for Angiographic Images Employing Multi-Scale Filtering Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Non-invasive physiological assessment of coronary artery obstruction on coronary computed tomography angiography.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Segmentation of coronary arteries in computed tomography angiography (CTA) images plays a key role in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary-related diseases. However, manually analyzing the large amount of data is time-consuming, and interpreting this data requires the prior knowledge and expertise of radiologists. Therefore, an automatic method is needed to separate coronary arteries from a given CTA dataset. Methods: Firstly, an anisotropic diffusion filter was employed to smooth the noise while preserving the vessel boundaries. The coronary skeleton was then extracted using a two-step process based on the intensity of the coronary. In the first step, the thick vessel skeleton was extracted by clustering, improved vesselness filtering and region growing, while in the second step, the thin vessel skeleton was extracted by the height ridge traversal method guided by the cylindrical model. Next, the vesselness measure, representing vessel a priori information, was incorporated into the local region active contour model based on the vessel geometry. Finally, the initial contour of the active contour model was generated using the coronary artery skeleton for effective segmentation of the three-dimensional (3D) coronary arteries. Results: Experimental results on chest CTA images show that the method is able to segment coronary arteries effectively with an average precision, recall and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 86.64%, 91.26% and 79.13%, respectively, and has a good performance in thin vessel extraction. Conclusions: The method does not require manual selection of vessel seeds or setting of initial contours, and allows for the extraction of a successful coronary artery skeleton and eventual effective segmentation of the coronary arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.