ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
A preliminary study of modified inflatable mediastinoscopic and single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic esophagectomy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- First series of da Vinci single-port robotic-assisted cervical oesophagectomy: single-centre IDEAL stage 2a/2b study.BJS open · 2026Article
- Advances in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy-An Overview of Recent Developments and a Novel Classification of Innovations in Treatment of Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- A novel stepwise and continuous high-volume irrigation drainage technique for managing cervical anastomotic leaks post-esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopic esophagectomy via right cervical auxiliary operating port and sternal lifting: a safe and reliable surgical method.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Application of tissue pneumoperitoneum technique around lymph nodes in thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal malignancies have a high morbidity rate worldwide, and minimally invasive surgery has emerged as the primary approach for treating esophageal cancer. In recent years, there has been increasing discussion about the potential of employing inflatable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic approaches as an option for esophagectomy. Building on the primary modification of the inflatable mediastinoscopic technique, we introduced a secondary modification to further minimize surgical trauma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopic esophagectomy at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from March 2020 to March 2023. The patients were allocated to the following two groups: the traditional (primary modification) group, and the secondary modification group. Operation times, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: The procedure was successfully performed in all patients, and conversion to open surgery was not required in any case. There were no statistically significant differences in the surgical operation time, intraoperative bleeding, number of dissected lymph nodes, and rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage between the two groups. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the length of the mobilized esophagus between the two groups. The mobilization of esophagus to the level of diaphragmatic hiatus via the cervical incision was successfully achieved in more patients in the secondary modification group than the primary modification group. Conclusions: Inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic esophagectomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure. The use of a 5-mm flexible endoscope, ultra-long five-leaf forceps, and LigaSure Maryland forceps facilitates esophageal mobilization and lymph node dissection through a single cervical incision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.