ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Suction versus non-suction drainage strategy after uniportal thoracoscopic lung surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Alveolar Injury to Precision Perioperative Care: Integrating Molecular Biomarkers and Technology-Enabled Strategies for Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Review
- Article
- Observational
- Comparison of the efficacy of subxiphoid and intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Chest Tubes and Pleural Drainage: History and Current Status in Pleural Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The postoperative outcomes of suction drainage versus non-suction drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) come with little consensus. This study aimed to prospectively compare the postoperative outcomes of suction drainage versus non-suction drainage in patients who underwent UniVATS. Methods: Between October 2022 and January 2023, patients undergoing UniVATS were prospectively enrolled. The choice of drainage strategy (suction or non-suction) was at the surgeon's discretion. The primary outcome was chest tube duration, with secondary outcomes including postoperative drainage volume, pain scores, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization cost. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 206 patients were enrolled in this study, with 103 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The chest tube duration did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, suction drainage exhibited a significantly lower total drainage volume compared to non-suction drainage (280.00 Conclusions: These findings suggested that the suction drainage was superior to non-suction drainage in terms of postoperative drainage volume and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing UniVATS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.