Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738206›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Survey of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Treatment Practices and Adherence to Management Guidelines (Pedi-SPECTRUM e-Survey).

Renu Suthar, Suresh Kumar Angurana, Karthi Nallasamy, Arun Bansal, Jayashree Muralidharan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renu SutharDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-6168
Suresh Kumar AnguranaDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-8258
Karthi NallasamyDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-9846
Arun BansalDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-6889
Jayashree MuralidharanDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-1355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Survey of treatment practices and adherence to pediatric status epilepticus (PSE) management guidelines in India. Methods: This eSurvey was conducted over 35 days (15th October to 20th November 2023) and included questions related to hospital setting; antiseizure medications (ASMs); ancillary treatment; facilities available; etiology; and adherence to PSE management guidelines. Results: A total of 170 respondents participated, majority of them were working in tertiary level hospitals (94.1%) as pediatric intensivists (56.5%) and pediatricians (19.4%), and were in clinical practice for 2-10 years (46.5%). Majority use intravenous (IV) midazolam and levetiracetam as first- and second-line ASMs (67.1 and 51.2%, respectively). In cases with refractory status epilepticus (RSE), the most commonly used ASM is midazolam infusion (92.4%). For super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), the commonly used third-line ASMs include midazolam infusion (34.1%), thiopentone infusion (26.5%), high dose phenobarbitone (18.2%), and ketamine infusion (15.3%). Overall, in cases with SRSE, 44.7% respondents use ketamine infusion, 42.5% use add-on oral topiramate, and 34.7% use high-dose phenobarbitone (1-3 mg/kg/hour) infusion. Most respondents targeted both clinical and EEG seizure control (48.8%). Ancillary treatment used for SRSE included IV pyridoxine (57.1%), methylprednisolone (45.3%), IVIG (42.4%), ketogenic diet (40.6%), and second-line immunomodulation (33.5%). Most common causes were febrile SE, viral encephalitis, and febrile illness-related epilepsy syndrome (60.6%, 52.4%, and 37.1%, respectively). Facilities available included pediatric intensive care units (PICU) (97.1%), mechanical ventilation (98.2%), pediatric neurologist (68.8%), MRI brain (86.5%), EEG (69.4%), and viral PCR (58.2%). The compliance with guidelines for timing of initiation of ASM ranged from 63.5 to 88.8%. Conclusion: Intravenous midazolam bolus/es, levetiracetam, and midazolam infusion are commonly used first-, second-, and third-line ASMs, respectively. There were wide variations in use of ASMs for RSE and SRSE, ancillary treatment, and compliance to PSE management guidelines. How to cite this article: Suthar R, Angurana SK, Nallasamy K, Bansal A, Muralidharan J. Survey of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Treatment Practices and Adherence to Management Guidelines (Pedi-SPECTRUM e-Survey). Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):504-510.

Indexed as

Antiseizure medicationsMidazolamNonconvulsive status epilepticusStatus epilepticusThiopentone

Identifiers

PMID38738206
PMCPMC11080095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.