ReviewCureus2024
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Surveillance Studies for Detecting Dysplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)is an extremely common gastrointestinal disorder that can give rise to dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC). There are various diagnostic methods but endoscopy has proved to be the best in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of IBD. The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopy in detecting patients with IBD. A structured search strategy on PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was used, as well as formal inclusion or exclusion, data extraction, validity assessment, and meta-analysis. RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) (Computer program). Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) was used for the meta-analysis, and forest plots were generated for each outcome separately. All of these studies are prospective cohorts and 11 of these are randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In IBD, both chromoendoscopy and white light endoscopy are useful in detecting dysplasia and neoplastic lesions. Furthermore, narrow-band imaging is a less time-consuming option for endoscopic surveillance. The meta-analysis also showed that chromoendoscopy is superior to other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.