Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738161›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Incidence of Postoperative Flare-Up After Single-Visit and Multi-visit Endodontic Therapy.

Denitsa Zaneva-Hristova, Tsvetelina Borisova-Papancheva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Denitsa Zaneva-HristovaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, The Faculty of Dental Medicine-Varna, Varna, BGR.
Tsvetelina Borisova-PapanchevaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents results obtained from a survey, including patients who underwent endodontic treatment by the single-visit or multi-visit method, after confirmation of the diagnosis of chronic apical periodontitis.

objectiveThe aim of the survey was to obtain data from the studied patients on the frequency and the type of postoperative pain after treatment of chronic apical periodontitis, as well as whether there is a relation between gender, age, and postoperative pain. MATERIALS AND

methodsA visual analog scale was used to study the intensity of postoperative pain in the treatment of teeth diagnosed with CPP, which are treated by one of two methods - single-visit or multi-visit method. The total number of surveyed patients is 71. The patients were examined and treated at the Dental Clinic "Imperial" in Varna, Bulgaria, in 2020. Thirty-one of them were treated by the single-visit method, and the remaining 40 by the multi-visit method with placement of a temporary dressing or sterile swab.

resultsA relatively large proportion (70%) of patients reported mild pain immediately after the root canal filling. A relatively large proportion (90.3%) of patients did not report pain one week after the root canal filling. The more frequent symptoms were observed in cases treated by the multi-visit method, after the application of a temporary dressing. Patients who reported taking analgesics were treated in the multi-visit method. More frequent pain symptoms with both methods of treatment were observed in men aged 36-60 years.

conclusionAlthough exacerbation has been shown to have no significant effect on the outcome of endodontic treatment, it is highly undesirable. In the short term, the postoperative pain in patients treated by the multi-visit method through the use of intracanal medication is more pronounced. Patients receiving the single-visit treatment reported less postoperative pain.

Indexed as

chronic apical periodontitisflare-upmulti-visit endodontic therapypostoperative painsingle-visit endodontic treatment

Identifiers

PMID38738161
PMCPMC11088455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.