Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38738027›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Enhancing Patient Safety Through Effective Interprofessional Communication: A Focus on Medication Error Prevention.

Anas Alhur, Afrah A Alhur, Dhay Al-Rowais, Shahad Asiri, Hala Muslim, Dhai Alotaibi, Basha Al-Rowais, Fay Alotaibi, Shahd Al-Hussayein, Amjad Alamri and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The use of communication applications in orthopaedics: a scoping review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anas AlhurHealth Informatics, University of Hail College of Public Health and Health Informatics, Hail, SAU.
Afrah A AlhurClinical Nutrition, University of Hail, Hail, SAU.
Dhay Al-RowaisPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Shahad AsiriPharmacology, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.
Hala MuslimPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Dhai AlotaibiPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Basha Al-RowaisPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Fay AlotaibiPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Shahd Al-HussayeinPharmacology, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Amjad AlamriPharmacology, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.
Balsam FayaPharmacology, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.
Weam RashoudPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Rehab AlshahraniPharmacology, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.
Norah AlsumaitPharmacology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, SAU.
Huda AlqhtaniPharmacology, King Khalid University, Abah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors significantly impact patient safety and healthcare costs. This study investigates the influence of interprofessional communication on medication error rates, with a focus on identifying actionable strategies to improve communication efficacy among healthcare professionals.

methodsUtilizing a quantitative approach, this research distributed a detailed online questionnaire to a broad cohort of healthcare workers in various settings within Saudi Arabia. The survey encompassed sections on demographics, the frequency and quality of interprofessional communication, perceived barriers and facilitators to effective communication, and personal experiences with medication errors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS to derive descriptive and inferential statistics, alongside thematic analysis for qualitative responses.

resultsThe survey attracted 1165 respondents, predominantly aged 20-30 (68.58%) and female (65.49%). Pharmacists constituted the largest professional group (40.34%). We identified a notable positive correlation (r = 0.16) between high-quality interprofessional communication and employment in hospital environments or having 5-20 years of experience. In contrast, negative correlations were observed with employment in non-traditional healthcare settings (r = -0.19) and professionals with less than five years of experience (r = -0.13), indicating communication challenges. The analysis also highlighted a concerning frequency of prescription and dispensing errors, with 52.70% of participants reporting prescription errors as the most common issue encountered.

conclusionEffective interprofessional communication is pivotal in mitigating medication errors within healthcare settings. The study illuminates specific areas for improvement, including the need for targeted communication training, particularly for less experienced professionals and those in non-traditional settings. Enhancing communication channels and fostering an environment conducive to open, interdisciplinary dialogue are essential steps towards advancing patient safety and reducing medication errors.

Indexed as

communication barriershealthcare collaborationhealthcare workforceinterprofessional communicationmedication error preventionmedication managementpatient safetyquality of caresaudi arabia healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38738027
PMCPMC11087152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.