Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737967›Full record

ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2022

Challenges of virtual RDS for recruitment of sexual minority women for a behavioral health study.

Deirdre Middleton, Laurie A Drabble, Deborah Krug, Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe, Amy A Mericle, Tonda L Hughes, Ronaldo Iachan, Karen F Trocki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deirdre MiddletonSenior Survey Research Manager, ICF International.
Laurie A DrabbleAssociate Dean for Research and Faculty, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA.
Deborah KrugSenior Research Data Analyst, ICF International.
Katherine J Karriker-JaffeDirector, Community Health & Implementation Research Program, RTI International, Berkeley, CA USA.
Amy A MericleScientist, Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Tonda L HughesProfessor and Associate Dean of Global Health, School of Nursing and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Ronaldo IachanMethodologist/Statistician, Senior Director, ICF International.
Karen F TrockiScientist, Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LUI, CAMILLIA K. · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
Sexual Orientation Differences: Prevalence & Correlates of Substance Use & AbuseR01DA036606 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI DRABBLE, LAURIE ANNE, TROCKI, KAREN F. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respondent driven sampling (RDS) is an approach commonly used to recruit nonprobability samples of rare and hard-to-find populations. The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of phone and web-based RDS methodology to sample sexual minority women (SMW) for participation in a telephone survey. Key features included 1) utilizing a national probability survey sample to select seeds; 2) web-based recruitment with emailed coupons; and 3) virtual processes for orienting, screening and scheduling potential participants for computer-assisted telephone interviews. Rather than resulting in a large diverse sample of SMW, only a small group of randomly selected women completed the survey and agreed to recruit their peers, and very few women recruited even one participant. Only seeds from the most recent of two waves of the probability study generated new SMW recruits. Three RDS attempts to recruit SMW over several years and findings from brief qualitative interviews revealed four key challenges to successful phone and web-based RDS with this population. First, population-based sampling precludes sampling based on participant characteristics that are often used in RDS. Second, methods that distance prospective participants from the research team may impede development of relationships, investment in the study, and motivation to participate. Third, recruitment for telephone surveys may be impeded by multiple burdens on seeds and recruits (e.g., survey length, understanding the study and RDS process). Finally, many seeds from a population-based sample may be needed, which is not generally feasible when working with a limited pool of potential seeds. This method may yield short recruitment chains, which would not meet key RDS assumptions for approximation of a probability sample. In conclusion, potential challenges to using RDS in studies with SMW, particularly those using virtual approaches, should be considered.

Indexed as

behavioral health researchLGBTpopulation-based seedsRespondent driven samplingsexual and gender minoritiessexual minority women

Identifiers

PMID38737967
PMCPMC11086662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.