ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Global research trends in Total Body Irradiation: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This manuscript presents a bibliometric and visualization analysis of Total Body Irradiation (TBI) research, aiming to elucidate trends, gaps, and future directions in the field. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the global research landscape of TBI, highlighting its key contributions, evolving trends, and potential areas for future exploration. Methods: The data for this study were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), encompassing articles published up to May 2023. The analysis included original studies, abstracts, and review articles focusing on TBI-related research. Bibliometric indicators such as total publications (TP), total citations (TC), and citations per publication (C/P) were utilized to assess the research output and impact. Visualization tools such as VOS Viewer were employed for thematic mapping and to illustrate international collaboration networks. Results: The analysis revealed a substantial body of literature, with 7,315 articles published by 2,650 institutions involving, 13,979 authors. Full-length articles were predominant, highlighting their central role in the dissemination of TBI research. The authorship pattern indicated a diverse range of scholarly influences, with both established and emerging researchers contributing significantly. The USA led in global contributions, with significant international collaborations observed. Recent research trends have focused on refining TBI treatment techniques, investigating long-term patient effects, and advancing dosimetry and biomarker studies for radiation exposure assessments. Conclusions: TBI research exhibits a dynamic and multifaceted landscape, driven by global collaboration and innovation. It highlights the clinical challenges of TBI, such as its adverse effects and the need for tailored treatments in pediatric cases. Crucially, the study also acknowledges the fundamental science underpinning TBI, including its effects on inflammatory and apoptotic pathways, DNA damage, and the varied sensitivity of cells and tissues. This dual focus enhances our understanding of TBI, guiding future research toward innovative solutions and comprehensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.