Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737682›Full record

ReviewTranslational cancer research2024

Advances in monotherapy and combination therapy of S-1 for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.

Feiyi Cao, Cuiping Gu, Wei Hong, Ying Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feiyi CaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Cuiping GuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Wei HongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Ying JinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Both domestically and worldwide, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain the leading cause of cancer-related death. As a fluorouracil derivative, S-1 which shows good efficacy and with few adverse effects have been widely confirmed in many solid tumors that it can provide a glimmer of hope for advanced NSCLC patients. We performed a review to explore the results of previous clinical studies of S-1 monotherapy as well as combined therapy involving S-1 in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Medline and PubMed databases using the keywords "S-1" AND "Advanced lung cancer" OR "Pharmacological mechanism". Key Content and Findings: A number of phase II clinical studies have reported on the favorable efficacy and excellent safety profiles of S-1 monotherapy in first-line or in posterior-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. In regard to S-1 in combination with chemotherapy, a number of phase II/III clinical studies have found the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of these regimens are similar to or better than immunological monotherapy with fewer adverse effects. In the case of S-1 combined with anti-vascular therapy, a number of phase II single-arm clinical studies have found that S-1 combined with bevacizumab, anlotinib and apatinib in advanced NSCLC, exhibits higher antitumor activity, less adverse effects for patients with advanced NSCLC. A phase II single-arm clinical study of gefitinib combined with S-1 had the ORR of 85.7% in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. As for the combination of S-1 and immunotherapy, preliminary results of a phase II retrospective clinical trial demonstrated that the ORR was significantly better with S-1 sequential after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) than with S-1 alone. Conclusions: The findings indicate promising effectiveness and minimal toxicity with S-1 monotherapy and S-1 containing combined therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC to provide a potential treatment option for advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

Chemotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)platinum combinationS-1

Identifiers

PMID38737682
PMCPMC11082661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.