Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737674›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2024

The application of computer-aided diagnosis in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ultrasound training for residents-a randomized controlled study.

Shuyi Lyu, Meiwu Zhang, Baisong Zhang, Libo Gao, Liu Yang, Susanna Guerrini, Eugene Ong, Yan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuyi LyuDepartment of Ultrasound, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-7255
Meiwu ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Baisong ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Libo GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Liu YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Susanna GuerriniUnit of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Medical Sciences, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Eugene OngDiagnostic Radiology, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The consistency of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification among experienced radiologists is different, which is difficult for inexperienced radiologists to master. This study aims to explore the value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) (AI-SONIC breast automatic detection system) in the BI-RADS training for residents. Methods: A total of 12 residents who participated in the first year and the second year of standardized resident training in Ningbo No. 2 Hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into 3 groups (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) for BI-RADS training. They were asked to complete 2 tests and questionnaires at the beginning and end of the training. After the first test, the educational materials were given to the residents and reviewed during the breast imaging training month. Group 1 studied independently, Group 2 studied with CAD, and Group 3 was taught face-to-face by experts. The test scores and ultrasonographic descriptors of the residents were evaluated and compared with those of the radiology specialists. The trainees' confidence and recognition degree of CAD were investigated by questionnaire. Results: There was no statistical significance in the scores of residents in the first test among the 3 groups (P=0.637). After training and learning, the scores of all 3 groups of residents were improved in the second test (P=0.006). Group 2 (52±7.30) and Group 3 (54±5.16) scored significantly higher than Group 1 (38±3.65). The consistency of ultrasonographic descriptors and final assessments between the residents and senior radiologists were improved (κ3 > κ2 > κ1), with κ2 and κ3 >0.4 (moderately consistent with experts), and κ1 =0.225 (fairly agreed with experts). The results of the questionnaire showed that the trainees had increased confidence in BI-RADS classification, especially Group 2 (1.5 to 3.5) and Group 3 (1.25 to 3.75). All trainees agreed that CAD was helpful for BI-RADS learning (Likert scale score: 4.75 out of 5) and were willing to use CAD as an aid (4.5, max. 5). Conclusions: The AI-SONIC breast automatic detection system can help residents to quickly master BI-RADS, improve the consistency between residents and experts, and help to improve the confidence of residents in the classification of BI-RADS, which may have potential value in the BI-RADS training for radiology residents. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400081672).

Indexed as

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)residenttrainingUltrasound (US)

Identifiers

PMID38737674
PMCPMC11082692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.