ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024
Innovative Therapeutic Approaches in Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To provide real-word clinical follow-up data on patients carrying variations of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and who respond to some innovative drugs. Methods: Patients recruited from the Neurology Department of the Mustapha Bacha university hospital in Algiers. Treated with innovative drugs, they were monitored and their clinical progress was evaluated on the basis of clinical arguments suggestive of CMSs, but also para clinical arguments (electromyography and genetic study). Results: Six patients carrying different mutations in different genes of CMSs were studied. They had different pathophysiologic profiles (slow or fast channel syndromes, low expressor of receptor). Their therapeutic management was based on innovative drugs, normally indicated in other, non-neurological pathologies. Their outcome was toward a clear clinical improvement. Discussion: This work relates the interest of proposing treatments (outside of Pyridostigmine) in the management of CMSs. These therapies can greatly modify the prognosis of patients suffering from this orphan disease. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with congenital myasthenic syndromes, some innovative treatments are effective.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.