Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737498›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2023

CTFlow: Mitigating Effects of Computed Tomography Acquisition and Reconstruction with Normalizing Flows.

Leihao Wei, Anil Yadav, William Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Intelligence Is Brittle: We Need to Do Better.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leihao WeiDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Anil YadavMedical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
William HsuMedical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

Funding

Computational Toolkit for Normalizing the Impact of CT Acquisition and Reconstruction on Quantitative Image FeaturesR01EB031993 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HSU, WILLIAM, MCNITT-GRAY, MICHAEL F · 2022 to 2024
$2.1M
Computational Toolkit for Normalizing the Impact of CT Acquisition and Reconstruction on Quantitative Image FeaturesR56EB031993 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HSU, WILLIAM, MCNITT-GRAY, MICHAEL F · 2021 to 2021
$612k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031993NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB031993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitigating the effects of image appearance due to variations in computed tomography (CT) acquisition and reconstruction parameters is a challenging inverse problem. We present CTFlow, a normalizing flows-based method for harmonizing CT scans acquired and reconstructed using different doses and kernels to a target scan. Unlike existing state-of-the-art image harmonization approaches that only generate a single output, flow-based methods learn the explicit conditional density and output the entire spectrum of plausible reconstruction, reflecting the underlying uncertainty of the problem. We demonstrate how normalizing flows reduces variability in image quality and the performance of a machine learning algorithm for lung nodule detection. We evaluate the performance of CTFlow by 1) comparing it with other techniques on a denoising task using the AAPM-Mayo Clinical Low-Dose CT Grand Challenge dataset, and 2) demonstrating consistency in nodule detection performance across 186 real-world low-dose CT chest scans acquired at our institution. CTFlow performs better in the denoising task for both peak signal-to-noise ratio and perceptual quality metrics. Moreover, CTFlow produces more consistent predictions across all dose and kernel conditions than generative adversarial network (GAN)-based image harmonization on a lung nodule detection task. The code is available at https://github.com/hsu-lab/ctflow.

Indexed as

computed tomographyImage harmonizationnormalizing flows

Identifiers

PMID38737498
PMCPMC11086056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.