ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2023
CTFlow: Mitigating Effects of Computed Tomography Acquisition and Reconstruction with Normalizing Flows.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Is Brittle: We Need to Do Better.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Synthetic data generation methods in healthcare: A review on open-source tools and methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitigating the effects of image appearance due to variations in computed tomography (CT) acquisition and reconstruction parameters is a challenging inverse problem. We present CTFlow, a normalizing flows-based method for harmonizing CT scans acquired and reconstructed using different doses and kernels to a target scan. Unlike existing state-of-the-art image harmonization approaches that only generate a single output, flow-based methods learn the explicit conditional density and output the entire spectrum of plausible reconstruction, reflecting the underlying uncertainty of the problem. We demonstrate how normalizing flows reduces variability in image quality and the performance of a machine learning algorithm for lung nodule detection. We evaluate the performance of CTFlow by 1) comparing it with other techniques on a denoising task using the AAPM-Mayo Clinical Low-Dose CT Grand Challenge dataset, and 2) demonstrating consistency in nodule detection performance across 186 real-world low-dose CT chest scans acquired at our institution. CTFlow performs better in the denoising task for both peak signal-to-noise ratio and perceptual quality metrics. Moreover, CTFlow produces more consistent predictions across all dose and kernel conditions than generative adversarial network (GAN)-based image harmonization on a lung nodule detection task. The code is available at https://github.com/hsu-lab/ctflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.