Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737454›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular bioengineering2024

Field Guide to Traction Force Microscopy.

Aleksandra K Denisin, Honesty Kim, Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse, Beth L Pruitt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Traction Force Microscopy for Viscoelastic Substrates: A Semi-Analytical Method.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measurement of cellular traction forces during confined migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Uncertainty-aware traction force microscopy.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aleksandra K Denisin *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Honesty Kim *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Ingmar H Riedel-KruseDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and (by courtesy) Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Applied Mathematics, and Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
Beth L PruittDepartments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-2124

Funding

From proteins to cells to tissues: A multi-scale assessment of biomechanical regulation by the myosin molecular motorRM1GM131981 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BERNSTEIN, DANIEL, MACK, DAVID LEE · 2019 to 2023
$10.3M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY/NUTRITIONT32DK007762 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI James Bayrer · 1998 to 2026
$7.3M
Effect of Microgravity on Drug Responses Using Engineered Heart TissuesUG3TR002588 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PRUITT, BETH L, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2018 to 2019
$1.5M
From synthetic bacterial adhesions to synthetic bacterial materialsR01GM145893 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI RIEDEL-KRUSE, HANS INGMAR · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
Biofilm Lithography: A newparadigm to optically control and study biofilm growth dynamicsR21AI139941 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI RIEDEL-KRUSE, HANS INGMAR, SPORMANN, ALFRED M · 2018 to 2019
$432k
NCATS NIH HHS UG3 TR002588NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI139941NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007762NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM145893NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM131981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Traction force microscopy (TFM) is a widely used technique to measure cell contractility on compliant substrates that mimic the stiffness of human tissues. For every step in a TFM workflow, users make choices which impact the quantitative results, yet many times the rationales and consequences for making these decisions are unclear. We have found few papers which show the complete experimental and mathematical steps of TFM, thus obfuscating the full effects of these decisions on the final output. Methods: Therefore, we present this "Field Guide" with the goal to explain the mathematical basis of common TFM methods to practitioners in an accessible way. We specifically focus on how errors propagate in TFM workflows given specific experimental design and analytical choices. Results: We cover important assumptions and considerations in TFM substrate manufacturing, substrate mechanical properties, imaging techniques, image processing methods, approaches and parameters used in calculating traction stress, and data-reporting strategies. Conclusions: By presenting a conceptual review and analysis of TFM-focused research articles published over the last two decades, we provide researchers in the field with a better understanding of their options to make more informed choices when creating TFM workflows depending on the type of cell being studied. With this review, we aim to empower experimentalists to quantify cell contractility with confidence. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-024-00801-6.

Indexed as

Cell biomechanicsMechanobiologyTraction force microscopy

Identifiers

PMID38737454
PMCPMC11082129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.