ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2024
A Model for Chemomechanical Coupling of Kinesin-3 Motor.
Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Kinesin-3 motor, which is in the monomeric and inactive form in solution, after cargo-induced dimerization can step on microtubules towards the plus end with a high velocity and a supperprocessivity, which is responsible for transporting the cargo in axons and dendrites. The kinesin-3 motor has a large initial landing rate to microtubules and spends the majority of its stepping cycle in a one-head-bound state. Under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor. Methods: To understand the physical origin of the peculiar features for the kinesin-3 motor, a model is presented here for its chemomechanical coupling. Based on the model the dynamics of the motor under no load, under the ramping load and under the constant load is studied analytically. Results: The theoretical results explain well the available experimental data under no load and under the ramping load. For comparison, the corresponding available experimental data for the kinesin-1 motor under the ramping load are also explained. The predicted results of the velocity, dissociation rate and run length versus the constant load for the kinesin-3 motor are provided. Conclusions: The study has strong implications for the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of the kinesin-3 dimer. The origin of the kinesin-3 dimer in the predominant one-head-bound state is due to the fact that the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the trailing head is much larger than that of ADP release from the MT-bound head. The study shows that the kinesin-3 ADP-head has an evidently longer interaction distance with microtubule than the kinesin-1 ADP-head, explaining why in the initial ADP state the kinesin-3 motor has the much larger landing rate than the kinesin-1 motor and why under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-024-00795-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.