Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737396›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2024

Medical Students' General Beliefs and Specific Perceptions about Patient Feedback Before and after Training in a Clinical Context.

M Charlotte L Eijkelboom, Renske A M de Kleijn, Joost Frenkel, Marieke F van der Schaaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Charlotte L EijkelboomUtrecht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-3628
Renske A M de KleijnUtrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-4199
Joost FrenkelDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0200-5425
Marieke F van der SchaafUtrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-5320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite its high potential, patient feedback does not always result in learning. For feedback to be effective students must engage with it, which partly depends on their perceptions of feedback. To better understand student engagement with patient feedback in a clinical context, this study explored the following research questions: 1) What are medical students' general beliefs about patient feedback and what are their specific perceptions of feedback messages? 2) What is the difference between these general beliefs and feedback message perceptions before and after patient feedback training? Methods: The study context was a 12-week clerkship combining Pediatrics and Gynecology, which included feedback training for students and asking for patient feedback. Ninety 4 Results: Both pre- and post-clerkship, students had positive general beliefs about patient feedback and positive perceptions of the feedback messages they received. However, paired t-tests showed that students' general beliefs and feedback message perceptions became less positive after feedback training and experience. Discussion: Patient feedback is not an easy means to learn and students do not become feedback literate in terms of patient feedback overnight. We suggest that future researchers further explore reasons for the decline in positive perceptions of patient feedback. We suggest implementing longitudinal feedback training in medical curricula, where students are guided and supported in the complex task of learning from patients through feedback.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipFeedbackStudents, MedicalAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38737396
PMCPMC11086596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.