Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737371›Full record

ReviewAustralian prescriber2024

Diagnosis and management of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults.

Daniel Hynes, Darren Mansfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian prescriber, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel HynesMonash Health, Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-5012
Darren MansfieldMonash Health, Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0565-9846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea is the most common form of sleep-disordered breathing. It is characterised by recurrent occlusion of the airway during sleep. Ensuing apnoeas terminate in arousal from sleep and lead to non-restorative sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness and adverse cardiovascular and neurocognitive effects. A sleep study should be offered to patients reporting witnessed apnoeas or symptoms related to non-restorative sleep. It should also be considered in the presence of predisposing factors for obstructive sleep apnoea (e.g. obesity, tonsillar hypertrophy, retrognathia, refractory hypertension). Treatment should aim to improve symptoms and reduce cardiovascular and neurocognitive risk. The treatment approach should consider the symptom burden, severity, anatomical factors, and patient preference. Positive airway pressure is the most effective treatment option, although intolerance and non-adherence are common. Other options include positional therapy, oral appliances and upper airway surgery. Weight loss and optimisation of cardiovascular disease risk should be considered in selected patients.

Indexed as

continuous positive airway pressureobstructive sleep apnoeasleep studysnoring

Identifiers

PMID38737371
PMCPMC11081737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.