Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737262›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Prediction of novel biomarkers for gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric adenocarcinoma using bioinformatics analysis.

Mohammad Reza Eskandarion, Sharareh Eskandarieh, Abbas Shakoori Farahani, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh, Farhad Shahi, Mohammad Ali Oghabian, Reza Shirkoohi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Management and surveillance strategies.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Reza EskandarionCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sharareh EskandariehMultiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas Shakoori FarahaniMedical Genetics Ward, IKHC Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Habibollah MahmoodzadehDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farhad ShahiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Ali OghabianMedical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza ShirkoohiCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & aim: The histologic and molecular changes from intestinal metaplasia (IM) to gastric cancer (GC) have not been fully characterized. The present study sought to identify potential alterations in signaling pathways in IM and GC to predict disease progression; these alterations can be considered therapeutic targets. Materials & methods: Seven gene expression profiles were selected from the GEO database. Discriminate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by EnrichR. The STRING database, Cytoscape, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), cBioPortal, NetworkAnalyst, MirWalk database, OncomiR, and bipartite miRNA‒mRNA correlation network was used for downstream analyses of selected module genes. Results: Analyses revealed that extracellular matrix-receptor interactions (ITGB1, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL4A1, FN1, COL6A3, and THBS2) in GC and PPAR signaling pathway interactions (FABP1, APOC3, APOA1, HMGCS2, and PPARA and PCK1) in IM may play key roles in both the carcinogenesis and progression of underlying GC from intestinal metaplasia. IM enrichment indicated that this is closely related to digestion and absorption. The TF-hub gene regulatory network revealed that AR, TCF4, SALL4, and ESR1 were more important for hub gene expression. It was revealed that the development and prediction of GC may be affected by hsa-miR-29. It was found that PTGR1, C1orf115, CRYL1, ALDOB, and SULT1B1 were downregulated in GC and upregulated in IM. Therefore, they might have tumor suppressor activity in GC progression. Conclusion: New potential biomarkers and pathways involved in GC and IM were identified that are important for the transformation of GC from IM to adenocarcinoma and can be therapeutic targets for GC.

Indexed as

Bioinformatics analysisDifferentially expressed genesGastric cancerIntestinal metaplasiaMicroRNATF

Identifiers

PMID38737262
PMCPMC11088262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.