ArticleHeliyon2024
Prediction of novel biomarkers for gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric adenocarcinoma using bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Molecular and Phenotypic Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells in Gastric Cancer: A Translational Perspective.FASEB bioAdvances · 2026Article
- Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Management and surveillance strategies.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Global Research Trends and Knowledge Structure in Autoimmune Gastritis andJournal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Identification of Novel Hub Genes and Potential Signaling Pathways with the Pathogenesis of Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- The role of microRNAs in gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- Mucin phenotype-based deep learning framework for intestinal metaplasia-carcinogenesis progression prediction.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- VASN drives gastric tumorigenesis via activation of the COL4A1/PI3K/AKT axis during Helicobacter pylori infection.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- The role of circular RNAs in gastric Cancer: Focusing on autophagy, EMT, and their crosstalk.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Multi-cohort validation based on coagulation-related genes for predicting prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Identification of potential immune-related genes and infiltrations in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Novel Core Gene Signature Associated with Inflammation-to-Metaplasia Transition in Influenza A Virus-Infected Lungs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- In Silico Insights Reveal Fibronectin 1 as a Theranostic Marker in Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & aim: The histologic and molecular changes from intestinal metaplasia (IM) to gastric cancer (GC) have not been fully characterized. The present study sought to identify potential alterations in signaling pathways in IM and GC to predict disease progression; these alterations can be considered therapeutic targets. Materials & methods: Seven gene expression profiles were selected from the GEO database. Discriminate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by EnrichR. The STRING database, Cytoscape, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), cBioPortal, NetworkAnalyst, MirWalk database, OncomiR, and bipartite miRNA‒mRNA correlation network was used for downstream analyses of selected module genes. Results: Analyses revealed that extracellular matrix-receptor interactions (ITGB1, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL4A1, FN1, COL6A3, and THBS2) in GC and PPAR signaling pathway interactions (FABP1, APOC3, APOA1, HMGCS2, and PPARA and PCK1) in IM may play key roles in both the carcinogenesis and progression of underlying GC from intestinal metaplasia. IM enrichment indicated that this is closely related to digestion and absorption. The TF-hub gene regulatory network revealed that AR, TCF4, SALL4, and ESR1 were more important for hub gene expression. It was revealed that the development and prediction of GC may be affected by hsa-miR-29. It was found that PTGR1, C1orf115, CRYL1, ALDOB, and SULT1B1 were downregulated in GC and upregulated in IM. Therefore, they might have tumor suppressor activity in GC progression. Conclusion: New potential biomarkers and pathways involved in GC and IM were identified that are important for the transformation of GC from IM to adenocarcinoma and can be therapeutic targets for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.