Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38737196›Full record

ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2024

FM-FCN: A Neural Network with Filtering Modules for Accurate Vital Signs Extraction.

Fangfang Zhu, Qichao Niu, Xiang Li, Qi Zhao, Honghong Su, Jianwei Shuai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangfang ZhuDepartment of Physics, and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Soft Functional Materials Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Qichao NiuVitalsilicon Technology Co. Ltd., Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314006, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Physics, and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Soft Functional Materials Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Qi ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China.
Honghong SuYangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Zhejiang, Jiaxing 314006, China.
Jianwei ShuaiWenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural networks excel at capturing local spatial patterns through convolutional modules, but they may struggle to identify and effectively utilize the morphological and amplitude periodic nature of physiological signals. In this work, we propose a novel network named filtering module fully convolutional network (FM-FCN), which fuses traditional filtering techniques with neural networks to amplify physiological signals and suppress noise. First, instead of using a fully connected layer, we use an FCN to preserve the time-dimensional correlation information of physiological signals, enabling multiple cycles of signals in the network and providing a basis for signal processing. Second, we introduce the FM as a network module that adapts to eliminate unwanted interference, leveraging the structure of the filter. This approach builds a bridge between deep learning and signal processing methodologies. Finally, we evaluate the performance of FM-FCN using remote photoplethysmography. Experimental results demonstrate that FM-FCN outperforms the second-ranked method in terms of both blood volume pulse (BVP) signal and heart rate (HR) accuracy. It substantially improves the quality of BVP waveform reconstruction, with a decrease of 20.23% in mean absolute error (

Identifiers

PMID38737196
PMCPMC11082448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.