ArticleMicro and nano engineering2023
Engineering inlet structures to enhance DNA capture into nanochannels in a polymer nanofluidic device produced via nanoimprint lithography.
Article in Micro and nano engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of nanopore measurements: from biological out-of-plane pores to plastic in-plane pores.Lab on a chip · 2026Review
- The Emergence of Nanofluidics for Single-Biomolecule Manipulation and Sensing.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Detection and identification of single ribonucleotide monophosphates using a dual in-plane nanopore sensor made in a thermoplasticLab on a chip · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Operating nanofluidic biosensors requires threading single molecules to be analyzed from microfluidic networks into nanostructures, mostly nanochannels or nanopores. Different inlet structures have been employed as a means of enhancing the number of the capture events into nanostructures. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of various engineered inlet structures formed at the micro/nanochannel interface on the capture of single λ-DNA molecules into the nanochannels. Different inlet geometries were evaluated and ranked in order of their effectiveness. Adding an inlet structure prior to a nanochannel effectively improved the DNA capture rate by 190 - 700 % relative to that for the abrupt micro/nanochannel interface. The capture of DNA from the microchannel to various inlets was determined mainly by the capture volumes of the inlet structures and the geometrically modified electric field in the inlet structure. However, as the width of the inlet structure increased, the hydrodynamic flow existing in the microchannel negatively influenced the DNA capture by dragging some DNA molecules deep into the inlet structure back to the microchannel. Our results indicate that engineering inlet structures is an effective means of controlling the capture of DNA molecules into nanostructures, which is important for operation of nanofluidic biosensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.