ArticleACS omega2024
Fortuitous Correlations in Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Their Harmful Influence on the Probability Distributions of the Main Principal Components.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Natural Flavonoids Targeting PLK-1 as Potential Anti-Metastatic Agents: A Computational Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonsense correlations frequently develop between independent random variables that evolve with time. Therefore, it is not surprising that they appear between the components of vectors carrying out multidimensional random walks, such as those describing the trajectories of biomolecules in molecular dynamics simulations. The existence of these correlations does not imply in itself a problem. Still, it can present a problem when the trajectories are analyzed with an algorithm such as the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) because it seeks to maximize correlations without discriminating whether they have physical origin or not. In this Article, we employ random walks occurring on multidimensional harmonic potentials to evaluate the influence of fortuitous correlations in PCA. We demonstrate that, because of them, this algorithm affords misleading results when applied to a single trajectory. The errors do not only affect the directions of the first eigenvectors and their eigenvalues, but the very definition of the molecule's "essential space" may be wrong. Additionally, the main principal component's probability distributions present artificial structures which do not correspond with the shape of the potential energy surface. Finally, we show that the PCA of two realistic protein models, human serum albumin and lysozyme, behave similarly to the simple harmonic models. In all cases, the problems can be mitigated and eventually eliminated by doing PCA on concatenated trajectories formed from a large enough number of individual simulations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.