ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Intramural hematoma extending from a dissection within an implanted stent: a case report treated with fenestration using a cutting balloon.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical coherence tomography guided additional Noevas bioresorbable vascular scaffold in the treatment of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Management of Catheter-Induced Coronary Artery Dissection Leading to Extensive Bidirectional Intramural Hematoma.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dissection after balloon dilation or stent implantation is a common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. In general, coronary stent implantation for coronary artery dissection is safe when the dissection is completely covered by the stent, particularly when dissection occurs during pre-dilation. However, here, we report a case of severe restenosis caused by a pre-dilation hematoma that extended after stent implantation. Case summary: A 76-year-old man was diagnosed with angina on exertion and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the right coronary artery. After pre-dilation with a cutting balloon, non-flow-limiting dissection occurred. An everolimus-eluting stent was implanted, completely sealing the dissection, and intravascular ultrasound revealed adequate stent expansion without stent edge dissection. Two weeks after the procedure, confirmatory coronary angiography revealed severe restenosis extending from the distal stent edge to the distal right coronary artery. Intravascular ultrasound revealed a hematoma extending from the middle of the stent to the distal segment. Discussion: The patient had been on steroids for a long time. The cutting balloon used for pre-dilation may have created a deep dissection reaching the tunica media, already rendered vulnerable by steroids, potentially leading to injury to the vasa vasorum. The intramural hematoma from the bleeding vasa vasorum might have been the underlying cause of this phenomenon, as evidenced by its increase in size despite the entry of the dissection being completely sealed. Cardiologists should be aware of this possibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.