Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38736840›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602024

Remote Between Visit Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: A Qualitative Study of CAPTURE-IBD Participants and Care Team Members.

Daniel Aintabi, Gillian Greenberg, Jeffrey A Berinstein, Melissa DeJonckheere, Daniel Wray, Rebecca K Sripada, Sameer D Saini, Peter D R Higgins, Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Models of outpatient care delivery in inflammatory bowel disease: a scoping review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel AintabiDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Health System, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
Gillian GreenbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jeffrey A BerinsteinDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Melissa DeJonckheereDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daniel WrayTwine Clinical Consulting, Park City, Utah, USA.
Rebecca K SripadaDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sameer D SainiDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Peter D R HigginsDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shirley Cohen-MekelburgDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5058-5527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We recently showed that CAPTURE-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-a care coordination intervention comprised of routine remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and a care coordinator-triggered care pathway-was more effective at reducing symptom burden for patients with IBD compared to usual care. We aimed to understand how patients and care team providers experienced the intervention and evaluate purported mechanisms of action to plan for future implementation. Methods: In this study, 205 patients were randomized to CAPTURE-IBD (n = 100) or usual care(n = 105). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 of the 100 participants in the CAPTURE-IBD arm and 5 care team providers to achieve thematic saturation. We used qualitative rapid analysis to generate a broad understanding of experiences, perceived impact, the coordinator role, and suggested improvements. Results: Findings highlight that the intervention was acceptable and user-friendly, despite concerns regarding increased nursing workload. Both participants and care team providers perceived the intervention as valuable in supporting symptom monitoring, psychosocial care, and between-visit action plans to improve IBD care and health outcomes. However, few participants leveraged the care coordinator as intended. Finally, participants reported that the intervention could be better tailored to capture day-to-day symptom changes and to meet the needs of patients with specific comorbid conditions (eg, ostomies). Conclusions: Remote PRO monitoring is acceptable and may be valuable in improving care management, promoting tight control, and supporting whole health in IBD. Future efforts should focus on testing and implementing refined versions of CAPTURE-IBD tailored to different clinical settings.

Indexed as

digital healthproactive careremote monitoringself-management

Identifiers

PMID38736840
PMCPMC11087934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.