Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38736805›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Modified rankin scale is a reliable tool for the rapid assessment of stroke severity and predicting disability outcomes.

Apoorv A Nimbvikar, Suhrud Panchawagh, Abhijit P Chavan, Jitendra R Ingole, Yash Pargaonkar, Rohan Pai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. From stroke to depression: The need for systematic screening for post-stroke depression.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Apoorv A NimbvikarDepartment of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Suhrud PanchawaghDepartment of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Abhijit P ChavanDepartment of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jitendra R IngoleDepartment of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Yash PargaonkarDepartment of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rohan PaiDepartment of Medicine, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: 'Time is brain' goes the adage. Rapid and precise management of stroke is of the utmost essence. The modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (mNIHSS) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) predict stroke severity and functional disability outcomes. However, the mRS can be administered more rapidly than the mNIHSS and therefore might be better to assess patient outcomes. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the correlation of stroke severity on admission and functional disability outcomes on the day of discharge or on the 8 Materials and Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study with a sample size of 61 participants. The mNIHSS score was calculated on admission for patients with clinical features suggestive of stroke and mRS was calculated on the 8 Results: Correlation between mNIHSS and mRS was positive and statistically significant (rho = 0.866, 95% CI [0.751, 0.925]. For each point increase in the mNIHSS, the odds of having higher mRS scores are 153% more than the odds of having lower mRS scores (aOR = 2.534, 95% CI [1.904, 3.560]). Conclusion: Our study concluded that mRS can be reliably used to predict the functional outcomes for patients with stroke in circumstances where the mNIHSS may prove to be lengthy. Thus, where 'time is brain', the mRS can be used with a similar power to predict the outcome.

Indexed as

Functional outcomesmodified NIHSSmodified Rankin Scalestrokestroke prognosisstroke severity

Identifiers

PMID38736805
PMCPMC11086762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.